Salvation Army

18 Cited authorities

  1. Lemon v. Kurtzman

    403 U.S. 602 (1971)   Cited 2,352 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Holding school-aid statute authorizing government inspection of parochial school records created an impermissible "intimate and continuing relationship between church and state" because it required the state "to determine which expenditures are religious and which are secular"
  2. Larson v. Valente

    456 U.S. 228 (1982)   Cited 688 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that setting aside an allegedly unlawful statutory provision that compels plaintiffs to register and report redresses the plaintiffs’ alleged injury of registering and reporting because, even though the plaintiffs could be compelled to register and report through another statutory provision, they will no longer be compelled to do so under the statutory provision at issue
  3. Mesnick v. General Electric Co.

    504 U.S. 985 (1992)   Cited 384 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a plaintiff must establish the same three elements to succeed on a claim for retaliation under M.G.L. c. 151B
  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Catholic Bishop

    440 U.S. 490 (1979)   Cited 460 times   48 Legal Analyses
    Holding that church-operated schools are not subject to NLRB jurisdiction
  5. Romano v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner Smith

    487 U.S. 1205 (1988)   Cited 106 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Upholding conclusion that employees classified as department managers did not meet executive exemption
  6. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 358 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act
  7. Tom Hudson Ass. v. City of Chula Vista

    472 U.S. 1028 (1985)   Cited 49 times
    Borrowing from California law for punitive damages standard
  8. University of Great Falls v. N.L.R.B

    278 F.3d 1335 (D.C. Cir. 2002)   Cited 44 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the court need not address a university's RFRA argument because the university was entitled to an exemption under Catholic Bishop, and observing that "RFRA presents a separate inquiry from Catholic Bishop"
  9. Asarco, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    86 F.3d 1401 (5th Cir. 1996)   Cited 22 times
    Finding of antiunion animus necessary to finding of section 8 violation
  10. Prill v. N.L.R.B

    835 F.2d 1481 (D.C. Cir. 1987)   Cited 27 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing that an employee takes concerted action “when he acts with the actual participation or on the authority of his co-workers”