Saffareene Gray, Petitioner,v.Lurita Alexis Doan, Administrator, General Services Administration, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionAug 22, 2008
0320080086 (E.E.O.C. Aug. 22, 2008)

0320080086

08-22-2008

Saffareene Gray, Petitioner, v. Lurita Alexis Doan, Administrator, General Services Administration, Agency.


Saffareene Gray,

Petitioner,

v.

Lurita Alexis Doan,

Administrator,

General Services Administration,

Agency.

Petition No. 0320080086

MSPB No. CB7121080009V1

DECISION

Petitioner filed a timely petition with the Equal Employment Opportunity

Commission asking for review of an Opinion and Order issued by the Merit

Systems Protection Board (MSPB) concerning her claim of discrimination

in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII),

as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.

Petitioner alleged that she was discriminated against on the basis of

color (not identified) when she was removed from her position of Lead

Contract Specialist, GS-13. Petitioner was removed for unacceptable

performance, failure to attend scheduled meetings as directed,

failure to submit reports as directed, and insubordination. Petitioner

grieved her removal, but did not raise discrimination claims during the

arbitration process. A hearing was held and thereafter an arbitrator

issued a decision denying the grievance and upholding the removal.

Petitioner then filed an appeal from the arbitrator's decision with the

MSPB. In her appeal she raised a claim of discrimination based on color.

In its opinion, the Board upheld the arbitrator's decision. The Board

found that petitioner failed to present any evidence that her removal

was tainted by discrimination. In effect, the Board found that petitioner

failed to show that the agency's reasons for its actions were a pretext

for discrimination. Petitioner then filed the instant petition.

EEOC Regulations provide that the Commission has jurisdiction over

mixed case appeals on which the MSPB has issued a decision that makes

determinations on allegations of discrimination. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.303

et seq. The Commission must determine whether the decision of the

MSPB with respect to the allegation of discrimination constitutes a

correct interpretation of any applicable law, rule, regulation or policy

directive, and is supported by the evidence in the record as a whole.

29 C.F.R. � 1614.305(c).

Based upon a thorough review of the record, it is the decision of

the Commission to concur with the final decision of the MSPB finding

no discrimination. The Commission finds that the MSPB's decision

constitutes a correct interpretation of the laws, rules, regulations,

and policies governing this matter and is supported by the evidence in

the record as a whole.

PETITIONER'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (W0408)

This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right of

administrative appeal from the Commission's decision. You have the right

to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court,

based on the decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board, within

thirty (30) calendar days of the date that you receive this decision.

If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the

complaint the person who is the official agency head or department head,

identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0408)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your

time in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil

action must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph

above ("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

August 22, 2008

__________________

Date

2

0320080086

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P. O. Box 19848

Washington, D.C. 20036

3

0320080086