§

Rupp Industries, Inc.

217 N.L.R.B. 385 (N.L.R.B. 1975)
Rupp Industries, Inc.

7 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Parts Co.

    375 U.S. 405 (1964)   Cited 213 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”

  2. Labor Board v. Cabot Carbon Co.

    360 U.S. 203 (1959)   Cited 57 times
    Concluding that "dealing with" as used in 29 U.S.C. § 152 is a "broad term" and is not synonymous to "bargaining with"

  3. Wilkinson Manufacturing Co. v. N.L.R.B

    456 F.2d 298 (8th Cir. 1972)   Cited 15 times

    Nos. 71-1021, 71-1030. March 1, 1972. Charles E. Sykes, Lincoln, Neb., for petitioner Wilkinson Mfg. Co. William A. Jolley, Kansas City, Mo., for petitioner United Steelworkers. Howard C. Hay, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Appeal from Petitions for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before VAN OOSTERHOUT, BRIGHT and STEPHENSON, Circuit Judges. BRIGHT, Circuit Judge. This labor-management controversy stems from the efforts of United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO

  4. Russell-Newman Mfg. Co. v. N.L.R.B

    370 F.2d 980 (5th Cir. 1967)   Cited 17 times

    No. 22955. December 27, 1966. Rehearing Denied January 25, 1967. Fritz L. Lyne, Lyne, Blanchette, Smith Shelton, George C. Dunlap, Dallas, Tex., for petitioner. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Janet A. Kohn, Atty., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Glen M. Bendixsen, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before BROWN, COLEMAN, and AINSWORTH, Circuit Judges. COLEMAN, Circuit Judge: The petitioner, Russell-Newman Manufacturing Company,

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Yokell

    387 F.2d 751 (2d Cir. 1967)   Cited 10 times

    No. 59, Docket 31114. Argued October 2, 1967. Decided December 4, 1967. Alan Eisenberg, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Glen M. Bendixsen, and Janet Kohn, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. James Carroll, New York City (Reichbart Reichbart, New York City, on the brief), for respondents. Before FRIENDLY, HAYS and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. ANDERSON, Circuit

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Grand Foundries, Inc.

    362 F.2d 702 (8th Cir. 1966)   Cited 9 times

    No. 18192. June 21, 1966. Bernard Dworski, Attorney, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner; Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel and Melvin Pollack, Attorney, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief. Donald W. Jones, of Daniel, Clampett, Ellis, Rittershouse Dalton, Springfield, Mo., for respondent; Ransom A. Ellis, Jr., of Daniel, Clampett, Ellis, Rittershouse Dalton, Springfield, Mo., on the brief. Before MATTHES, MEHAFFY and GIBSON, Circuit Judges

  7. Section 206 - Minimum wage

    29 U.S.C. § 206   Cited 9,057 times   101 Legal Analyses
    Asking only whether the alleged inequality resulted from “any other factor other than sex”