§

Royal Appliance Mfg. Co.

No. 75165479 (T.T.A.B. Sep. 18, 2000)
Royal Appliance Mfg. Co.

7 Cited authorities

  1. Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.

    434 U.S. 1025 (1978)   Cited 236 times
    Rejecting admissibility of these same OSHA regulations offered for the same purpose of putting the duty to safeguard multi-purpose presses on the employer

  2. Miller Brewing Co. v. G. Heileman Brewing Co.

    561 F.2d 75 (7th Cir. 1977)   Cited 157 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "light" and "lite" are generic adjectives for beer and opining that "[o]therwise a manufacturer could remove a common descriptive word from the public domain by investing his goods with an additional quality, thus gaining the exclusive right to call his wine `rose,' his whisky `blended,' or his bread `white'"

  3. H. Marvin Ginn Corp. v. International Ass'n of Fire Chiefs, Inc.

    782 F.2d 987 (Fed. Cir. 1986)   Cited 45 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Reversing decision of TTAB that "Fire Chief," as applied to monthly magazine circulated to fire departments, was generic

  4. In re Bush Bros. Co.

    884 F.2d 569 (Fed. Cir. 1989)   Cited 16 times   1 Legal Analyses

    No. 89-1071. September 1, 1989. Edward G. Fenwick, Mason, Fenwick Lawrence, Washington, D.C., submitted for appellant. With him on the brief was Brian D. Anderson. Albin F. Drost, Associate Sol., Office of the Sol., of Arlington, Va., submitted for appellee. With him on the brief was Fred E. McKelvey, Sol. Appeal from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Trademark Trial Appeal Board. Before NEWMAN, Circuit Judge, BENNETT, Senior Circuit Judge, and BISSELL, Circuit Judge. PAULINE NEWMAN, Circuit Judge

  5. Application of Helena Rubinstein, Inc.

    410 F.2d 438 (C.C.P.A. 1969)   Cited 10 times

    Patent Appeal Nos. 8144, 8145. May 15, 1969. Laforest S. Saulsbury, New York City, attorney of record, for appellant. Joseph Schimmel, Washington, D.C., for the Commissioner of Patents. Jack E. Armore, Washington, D.C., of counsel. Before WORLEY, Chief Judge, McGUIRE, Judge, sitting by designation, and RICH, ALMOND and BALDWIN, Judges. ALMOND, Judge. We are confronted here with two separate appeals from a single decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board affirming the examiner's refusal to

  6. Application of Simmons Company

    278 F.2d 517 (C.C.P.A. 1960)   Cited 11 times

    Patent Appeal No. 6552. May 24, 1960. Soans, Anderson, Luedeka Fitch, Cyril A. Soans, Chicago, Ill. (William E. Anderson, Chicago, Ill., of counsel), for appellant. Clarence W. Moore, Washington, D.C., for the Commissioner of Patents. Before WORLEY, Chief Judge, and RICH, MARTIN, and SMITH, Judges, and Judge WILLIAM H. KIRKPATRICK. United States Senior Judge for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, designated to participate in place of Judge O'CONNELL, pursuant to provisions of Section 294(d), Title

  7. Section 1091 - Supplemental register

    15 U.S.C. § 1091   Cited 78 times
    Stating that marks registered on the Supplemental Register "must be capable of distinguishing the applicant's goods or services"