River Oak Center for Children

7 Cited authorities

Metropolitan Edison Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
460 U.S. 693 (1983) Cited 313 times 8 Legal Analyses
Holding that a union may, under certain circumstances, waive members' NLRA rights
Detroit Edison Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
440 U.S. 301 (1979) Cited 228 times 20 Legal Analyses
Holding that a union's request for employee aptitude tests was relevant to its claim, but employer's interest in preserving confidentiality was also legitimate, and disclosing the information only upon the employee's written consent was a reasonable accommodation
N.L.R.B. v. Pfizer, Inc.
763 F.2d 887 (7th Cir. 1985) Cited 31 times
Holding that an employer's bare assertion that information is confidential does not entitle it to resist production
JHP & Associates, LLC v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
360 F.3d 904 (8th Cir. 2004) Cited 10 times
No. 03-2303. Submitted: November 17, 2003. Filed: March 16, 2004. On Petition for Review of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Lawrence P. Kaplan, argued, St. Louis, MO (Joshua M. Avigad, St. Louis, MO, on the brief), for appellant. Jeffrey L. Horowitz, argued, of the NLRB of Washington, D.C. (Charles Donnelly of the NLRB, Washington, D.C. appeared on the brief), for appellee. James I. Singer, argued, St. Louis, MO, intervenor, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local No
Grinnell Fire Protection Sys Co. v. N.L.R.B
272 F.3d 1028 (8th Cir. 2001) Cited 1 times
No. 00-4044, 01-1339. Submitted: September 10, 2001. Filed: December 5, 2001. Peter Chatilovicz, argued, Washington, DC (Charles F. Walters, Washington, DC, on the brief), for petitioner. Julie F. Marcus, NLRB, argued, Washington, DC, for appellee. Before LOKEN and FAGG, Circuit Judges, and BOGUE, District Judge. The Honorable Andrew W. Bogue, United States District Judge for the District of South Dakota, sitting by designation. PER CURIAM. The Road Sprinkler Fitters Union, Local 669 represents all
Chicago Tribune Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
79 F.3d 604 (7th Cir. 1996) Cited 5 times
Holding employer was required to provide the names of replacement employees, but not their home addresses, because of safety concerns, privacy rights and the union's ability to communicate with the employees through alternative means
N.L.R.B. v. New Associates
35 F.3d 828 (3d Cir. 1994) Cited 2 times
Denying enforcement of an NLRB order finding a violation of § 8 when the "NLRB possessed the data which would have enabled Hospitality Care to make an informed decision on whether the Union had lost majority support"

River Oak Center for Children

7 Cited authorities

Metropolitan Edison Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

Holding that a union may, under certain circumstances, waive members' NLRA rights

Detroit Edison Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

Holding that a union's request for employee aptitude tests was relevant to its claim, but employer's interest in preserving confidentiality was also legitimate, and disclosing the information only upon the employee's written consent was a reasonable accommodation

N.L.R.B. v. Pfizer, Inc.

Holding that an employer's bare assertion that information is confidential does not entitle it to resist production

JHP & Associates, LLC v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

Grinnell Fire Protection Sys Co. v. N.L.R.B

Chicago Tribune Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

Holding employer was required to provide the names of replacement employees, but not their home addresses, because of safety concerns, privacy rights and the union's ability to communicate with the employees through alternative means

N.L.R.B. v. New Associates

Denying enforcement of an NLRB order finding a violation of § 8 when the "NLRB possessed the data which would have enabled Hospitality Care to make an informed decision on whether the Union had lost majority support"