10 Cited authorities
Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. Animalfeeds Intr.
559 U.S. 662 (2010) Cited 1,724 times 211 Legal AnalysesHolding that a prudential ripeness argument was waived
Zimomra v. Alamo Rent-A-Car
522 U.S. 948 (1997) Cited 104 timesHolding that active supervision unnecessary where challenged ordinance left defendants, car rental companies at Denver International Airport, virtually no discretionary authority in setting and collecting usage fees from their customers because usage fee determined by detailed formula
O'Neill v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
509 U.S. 904 (1993) Cited 18 timesDeclining to apply the rule where "all the relevant facts were known. It was the meaning of the law that was misunderstood."
U.S. ex Rel. Fine v. Chevron, U.S.A., Inc.
72 F.3d 740 (9th Cir. 1995) Cited 56 timesHolding that dis-closures of a government auditor who "was employed specifically to disclose fraud" were "nonvoluntary" and that the auditor was thus not an "original source"
United States ex rel. Griffith v. Conn
Civil No. 11-157-ART (E.D. Ky. Feb. 24, 2015) Cited 2 timesCivil No. 11-157-ART 02-24-2015 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel. JENNIFER L. GRIFFITH and SARAH CARVER, Plaintiffs, v. ERIC C. CONN, et al., Defendants. Amul R. Thapar United States District Judge MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER *** *** *** *** When you work for the government and discover wrongdoing in your midst, may you recover as a whistleblower under the False Claims Act? On the one hand, why not? After all, government employees are often the individuals best positioned to discover wrongdoing
New Breed Leasing Corp. v. N.L.R.B
111 F.3d 1460 (9th Cir. 1997) Cited 17 timesHolding that an ALJ's credibility determinations will be upheld by the court “unless they are ‘inherently incredible or patently unreasonable’ ”
Roadway Exp., Inc. v. N.L.R.B
427 F. App'x 838 (11th Cir. 2011) Cited 3 timesNo. 10-12445. May 27, 2011. Todd A. Dawson, Baker Hostetler, LLP, Cleveland, OH, for Petitioner. Usha Dheenan, Linda Dreeben, Assistant General Counsel, Fred B. Jacob, Assistant General Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, DC, Rochelle Kentov, Christopher Zerby, Tampa, FL, for Respondent. Barbara M. Harvey, Detroit, MI, for Intervenor. Petition for Review of a Decision of the National Labor Relations Board and Cross Application for Enforcement. Agency No. 12-CA-22202. Before DUBINA
Local 32B-32J Service Emp. Intern. v. N.L.R.B
982 F.2d 845 (2d Cir. 1993) Cited 8 times 1 Legal AnalysesNos. 24, 81, Dockets 92-4039, 92-4055. Argued September 1, 1992. Decided January 7, 1993. Ira A. Sturm, New York City (Manning, Raab, Dealy Sturm, of counsel), for Local 32B-32J, Service Employees Intern. Union, AFL-CIO. Martin Gringer, Garden City, N Y (Franklin Gringer, P.C., of counsel), for Field Bridge Associates and Rachel Bridge Corp. Michael J. Gan, N.L.R.B., Washington, DC (Jerry M. Hunter, Gen. Counsel, Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel), for N.L.R.B. Petition for review
NVE Constructors, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
934 F.2d 1084 (9th Cir. 1991) Cited 6 timesNo. 89-70477. Argued and Submitted February 8, 1991. Decided June 6, 1991. John W. Prager, Jr., Thierman, Cook, Brown Prager, Santa Ana, Cal., for petitioner. Margaret G. Bezour and Laurence S. Zakson, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Walter Kamiat, Laurence Cohen, Sherman, Dunn, Chen, Leifer Yellig, Washington, D.C., and Anthony Segall, Reich, Adell Crost, Los Angeles, Cal., for intervenor. On Petition for Review of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before CHAMBERS, BEEZER
N.L.R.B. v. Heyman
541 F.2d 796 (9th Cir. 1976) Cited 15 timesFinding that in unfair labor practice case before the NLRB, the Board was required to give effect to previous district court judgment rendered in suit by employer under LMRA in which CBA was rescinded