§

Richards and Associates

110 N.L.R.B. 132 (N.L.R.B. 1954)
Richards and Associates

17 Cited authorities

  1. Nathanson v. Labor Board

    344 U.S. 25 (1952)   Cited 279 times
    Holding that "if one claimant is to be preferred over others, the purpose should be clear from the statute"

  2. Joy Silk Mills v. National Labor Rel. Board

    185 F.2d 732 (D.C. Cir. 1950)   Cited 162 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Joy Silk the Court held that when an employer could have no doubt as to the majority status or when an employer refuses recognition of a union "due to a desire to gain time and to take action to dissipate the union's majority, the refusal is no longer justifiable and constitutes a violation of the duty to bargain set forth in section 8(a)(5) of the Act".

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. W. Coast Casket Co.

    205 F.2d 902 (9th Cir. 1953)   Cited 37 times

    No. 13515. June 30, 1953. Rehearing Denied July 29, 1953. George J. Bott, Gen. Coun., David P. Findling, Asso. Gen. Coun., A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Coun., Frederick U. Reel and Rosanna A. Blake, Attorneys, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. James S. Duberg and Holmes E. Hobart, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent. Before DENMAN, Chief Judge, and ORR and POPE, Circuit Judges. ORR, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board, hereafter the Board, petitions for enforcement of an order

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Nabors

    196 F.2d 272 (5th Cir. 1952)   Cited 37 times

    No. 13526. April 29, 1952. Rehearing Denied June 6, 1952. Owsley Vose, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and David P. Findling, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, all of Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Martin Dies, Sr., Lufkin, Tex., for respondent. Before HOLMES, BORAH, and STRUM, Circuit Judges. STRUM, Circuit Judge. `This is a petition to enforce, and a cross petition to set aside, an order of the National Labor Relations Board, issued April 19, 1950, pursuant to Sec. 10(c) of the National Labor Relations

  5. National L. Rel. Bd. v. Syracuse Color P

    209 F.2d 596 (2d Cir. 1954)   Cited 21 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Syracuse Color Press, Inc., 2 Cir., 209 F.2d 596, we have upheld the Board in finding coercion in the pointed cross-examination of five employees as to union organizing activities within the plant.

  6. National Labor Rel. Board v. Kropp Forge Co.

    178 F.2d 822 (7th Cir. 1950)   Cited 22 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Kropp Forge Co., 7 Cir., 178 F.2d 822, and in N.L.R.B. v. La Salle Steel Co., 7 Cir., 178 F.2d 829, our examination and consideration of the entire record in each of those cases convinced us that there was a general pattern and plan of anti-union hostility justifying the Board in finding that the particular words and acts complained of were coercive.

  7. National Labor Rel. Board v. N.Y. Merchandise

    134 F.2d 949 (2d Cir. 1943)   Cited 28 times

    March 15, 1943. Proceeding by the National Labor Relations Board, petitioner, against New York Merchandise Company, Inc., respondent, for enforcement of order against respondent. On respondent's motion to refer proceeding back to petitioner. Motion granted upon condition. Scandrett, Tuttle Chalaire and Emanuel Turberg, all of New York City (Bernard Phillips, of New York City, of counsel), for the motion. Ernest A. Gross, of Washington, D.C., opposed. Before L. HAND, CHASE, and FRANK, Circuit Judges

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Quest-Shon Mark B

    185 F.2d 285 (2d Cir. 1950)   Cited 18 times

    No. 17, Docket 21624. Argued October 4, 1950. Decided November 9, 1950. Owsley Vose, Washington, D.C., Atty., National Labor Relations Board (David P. Findling, Asso. Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and George H. Plaut, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, all of Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Adolph I. King, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard P. Walsh, Washington, D.C., and Angelo A. Tumminelli, Brooklyn, N.Y., on the brief), for respondent. Before LEARNED HAND, Chief

  9. National Lbr. Rel. Bd. v. Botany Worsted Mills

    106 F.2d 263 (3d Cir. 1939)   Cited 29 times
    Striking interrogatories probing the decision making process of NLRB members

  10. National Labor Rel. Board v. Somerville Buick

    194 F.2d 56 (1st Cir. 1952)   Cited 13 times

    No. 4606. January 28, 1952. Dominick L. Manoli, Attorney, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. General Counsel, and Roland E. Ginsburg, Attorney, all of Washington, D.C., on brief), for petitioner. Julius Kirle, Boston, Mass., for respondent. Before CLARK, WOODBURY, and HARTIGAN, Circuit Judges. HARTIGAN, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board, pursuant to the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, 61

  11. Section 193-F:2 - Purpose and Intent

    N.H. Rev. Stat. § 193-F:2

    I. All pupils have the right to attend public schools, including chartered public schools, that are safe, secure, and peaceful environments. One of the legislature's highest priorities is to protect our children from physical, emotional, and psychological violence by addressing the harm caused by bullying and cyberbullying in our public schools. II. Bullying in schools has historically included actions shown to be motivated by a pupil's actual or perceived race, color, religion, national origin,