§

Reina E. Killfoil, Complainant, v. Janet Reno, Attorney General, Department of Justice, (Immigration and Naturalization Service), Agency.

01973197 (E.E.O.C. Jul. 19, 2000)
Reina E. Killfoil, Complainant, v. Janet Reno, Attorney General, Department of Justice, (Immigration and Naturalization Service), Agency.

4 Cited authorities

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    340 U.S. 474 (1951)   Cited 9,683 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "

  2. Albemarle Paper Co. v. Moody

    422 U.S. 405 (1975)   Cited 2,634 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employment policy cannot stand if another policy, "without a similarly undesirable racial effect, would also serve the employer's legitimate interest"

  3. Pullman-Standard v. Swint

    456 U.S. 273 (1982)   Cited 1,626 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[w]hen an appellate court discerns that a district court has failed to make a finding because of an erroneous view of the law, the usual rule is that there should be a remand for further proceedings to permit the trial court to make the missing findings"

  4. Franks v. Bowman Transportation Co.

    424 U.S. 747 (1976)   Cited 1,100 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the interests of "unnamed members of the class" who are entitled to relief may satisfy the case-or-controversy requirement