[Redacted], Julius P.,1 Complainant, v. Lloyd J. Austin III, Secretary, Department of Defense (Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences), Agency.
Appeal No. 2022002729 (E.E.O.C. Mar. 15, 2023)
[Redacted], Julius P.,1 Complainant, v. Lloyd J. Austin III, Secretary, Department of Defense (Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences), Agency.
29 U.S.C. § 621 Cited 17,695 times 21 Legal Analyses
Finding that "older workers find themselves disadvantaged in their efforts to retain employment, and especially to regain employment when displaced from jobs"
5 U.S.C. § 552 Cited 12,414 times 559 Legal Analyses
Holding that the Court's entering of a “Stipulation and Order” approving the parties' terms of dismissal did not amount to a “court-ordered consent decree” that would render the plaintiff the prevailing party
29 C.F.R. § 1614.103 Cited 211 times 3 Legal Analyses
Stating that complaints of discrimination within the federal government extend to "all employment policies or practices affecting employees or applicants for employment "
29 C.F.R. § 1614.405 Cited 83 times 3 Legal Analyses
Providing that " decision [of the EEOC in an administrative appeal] is final . . . unless . . . [e]ither party files a timely request for reconsideration"