[Redacted], Carmelo L., 1 Complainant, v. Louis DeJoy, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service (Southern Area), Agency.

14 Cited authorities

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green

    411 U.S. 792 (1973)   Cited 53,213 times   96 Legal Analyses
    Holding in employment discrimination case that statistical evidence of employer's general policy and practice may be relevant circumstantial evidence of discriminatory intent behind individual employment decision
  2. St. Mary's Honor Ctr. v. Hicks

    509 U.S. 502 (1993)   Cited 12,391 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a trier of fact may infer discrimination upon rejecting an employer's proffered reason for termination
  3. Tex. Dept. of Cmty. Affairs v. Burdine

    450 U.S. 248 (1981)   Cited 20,204 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding in the Title VII context that the plaintiff's prima facie case creates "a legally mandatory, rebuttable presumption" that shifts the burden of proof to the employer, and "if the employer is silent in the face of the presumption, the court must enter judgment for the plaintiff"
  4. Furnco Construction Corp. v. Waters

    438 U.S. 567 (1978)   Cited 2,180 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a district court was "entitled to consider the racial mix of the work force when trying to make the determination as to motivation" in the employment discrimination context
  5. Laffey v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.

    472 U.S. 1021 (1985)   Cited 280 times
    Denying risk multiplier because of dangers of conflict and inequities discussed by plurality in Delaware Valley
  6. Moore v. City of Charlotte

    754 F.2d 1100 (4th Cir. 1985)   Cited 303 times
    Holding that fact-finding was deficient when premised on "an unprincipled conception of `similarity' and `comparability,' a structural flaw"
  7. Worthy v. United States Steel Corp.

    616 F.2d 698 (3d Cir. 1980)   Cited 36 times
    Holding that the relative seriousness of the misconduct is significant in determining whether persons are similarly situated
  8. Mosley v. General Motors Corp.

    497 F. Supp. 583 (E.D. Mo. 1980)   Cited 13 times

    No. 72 C 551(2). September 30, 1980. Lee T. Lawless, Chackes Hoare, St. Louis, Mo., for Lumpkins, Mosley and Centers. James McDaniel, Barnard Baer, St. Louis, Mo., for General Motors. Morris J. Levin, Levin Weinhaus, St. Louis, Mo., John A. Fillion/Edwin G. Fabre, Detroit, Mich., for Local 25 UAW. MEMORANDUM NANGLE, District Judge. Plaintiffs brought this suit alleging that defendants discriminated against them on account of their race, in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1981 and 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a)

  9. Section 2000e - Definitions

    42 U.S.C. § 2000e   Cited 52,487 times   130 Legal Analyses
    Granting EEOC authority to issue procedural regulations to carry out Title VII provisions
  10. Section 1614.107 - Dismissals of complaints

    29 C.F.R. § 1614.107   Cited 477 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Explaining the notice requirements for partial dismissal of claims in an EEO complaint
  11. Section 1614.110 - Final action by agencies

    29 C.F.R. § 1614.110   Cited 229 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Compelling final decision “within 60 days of the end of the 30-day period for the complainant to request a hearing . . . where the complainant has not requested [one]”
  12. Section 1614.604 - Filing and computation of time

    29 C.F.R. § 1614.604   Cited 140 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Providing the time limits applicable to the subject regulations "are subject to waiver, estoppel and equitable tolling"
  13. Section 1614.405 - Decisions on appeals

    29 C.F.R. § 1614.405   Cited 83 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Providing that " decision [of the EEOC in an administrative appeal] is final . . . unless . . . [e]ither party files a timely request for reconsideration"
  14. Section 1614.403 - How to appeal

    29 C.F.R. § 1614.403   Cited 34 times
    Indicating that failure to file timely appeal requires dismissal by EEOC