Ralph Lenoci, Complainant,v.John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, (Northeast Area), Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSep 30, 2003
01A24232 (E.E.O.C. Sep. 30, 2003)

01A24232

09-30-2003

Ralph Lenoci, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, (Northeast Area), Agency.


Ralph Lenoci v. United States Postal Service

01A24232

September 30, 2003

.

Ralph Lenoci,

Complainant,

v.

John E. Potter,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

(Northeast Area),

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A24232

Agency No. 4B-060-0029-01

Hearing No. 160-A2-8142X

DECISION

Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405, the Commission accepts complainant's

appeal from the agency's final order in the above-entitled matter.

Complainant alleged that the agency discriminated against him on the

basis of color (white), in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights

Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq., when, on

November 2, 2000, complainant was issued a Notice of 7-Day Suspension

dated October 30, 2000. Complainant also alleged that the agency

discriminated against him on the bases of race (Caucasian), national

origin (Italian) and reprisal for prior EEO activity when, on May 18,

2001, complainant's request for auxiliary assistance was denied; and,

on May 18, 2001 and May 19, 2001, complainant was given conflicting

orders regarding casing and delivering his route.<1>

After a review of the record in its entirety, including consideration

of all statements submitted on appeal, it is the decision of the Equal

Employment Opportunity Commission to affirm the agency's final order,

because the Administrative Judge's issuance of a decision without a

hearing was appropriate, see Petty v. Department of Defense, EEOC Appeal

No. 01A24206 (July 11, 2003), and a preponderance of the record evidence

does not establish that discrimination occurred.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as

the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

September 30, 2003

__________________

Date

1Complainant originally cited age as a basis

for the alleged discrimination, but by letter dated December 13, 2000,

he withdrew the basis of age from his complaint.