Queen City Broadcasting of New York, Inc

8 Cited authorities

Ford Motor Co. (Chicago Stamping Plant) v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
441 U.S. 488 (1979) Cited 290 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that proposal concerning in-plant cafeteria prices was within duty to bargain despite fact that prices were set by third-party supplier rather than employer
St. George Warehouse, Inc. v. N.L.R.B
420 F.3d 294 (3d Cir. 2005) Cited 36 times 1 Legal Analyses
Explaining that under a substantial evidence standard of review, an administrative fact-finder's determinations on issues of credibility should not be reversed unless inherently incredible or patently unreasonable
Regal Cinemas, Inc. v. N.L.R.B
317 F.3d 300 (D.C. Cir. 2003) Cited 31 times 1 Legal Analyses
Affirming the Board's finding of a Section 8 violation where the layoff was motivated by labor costs rather than technological advances
McClatchy Newspapers, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
131 F.3d 1026 (D.C. Cir. 1997) Cited 11 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that agencies are entitled to deviate from reasoning used in prior decisions
Phelps Dodge Min. Co., Tyrone Br. v. N.L.R.B
22 F.3d 1493 (10th Cir. 1994) Cited 6 times
Holding that "appreciation" bonuses, one of which was given to all employees in an amount equal to eighty hours of work at each employee's standard pay rate, were not subject to mandatory bargaining
Seattle First National Bank v. N.L.R.B
444 F.2d 30 (9th Cir. 1971) Cited 26 times
In Seattle First National Bank, for example, the Ninth Circuit specifically noted (pointing to our opinion in W.W. Cross Co., supra) that group insurance plans involve issues traditionally considered "vital" to employees, as opposed to bank services, the putative benefit at issue in that case.
Boeing Co. v. N.L.R.B
581 F.2d 793 (9th Cir. 1978) Cited 11 times
Holding that a recognition clause defines which particular people are subject to the contract
N.L.R.B. v. Gulf Power Company
384 F.2d 822 (5th Cir. 1967) Cited 14 times
Holding that “safety rules and practices ... are undoubtedly conditions of employment, and ... Section 8(d) requires good faith bargaining as a mutual obligation of the employer and the Union in connection with such matters”

Queen City Broadcasting of New York, Inc

8 Cited authorities

Holding that proposal concerning in-plant cafeteria prices was within duty to bargain despite fact that prices were set by third-party supplier rather than employer

Explaining that under a substantial evidence standard of review, an administrative fact-finder's determinations on issues of credibility should not be reversed unless inherently incredible or patently unreasonable

Affirming the Board's finding of a Section 8 violation where the layoff was motivated by labor costs rather than technological advances

Holding that agencies are entitled to deviate from reasoning used in prior decisions

Holding that "appreciation" bonuses, one of which was given to all employees in an amount equal to eighty hours of work at each employee's standard pay rate, were not subject to mandatory bargaining

In Seattle First National Bank, for example, the Ninth Circuit specifically noted (pointing to our opinion in W.W. Cross Co., supra) that group insurance plans involve issues traditionally considered "vital" to employees, as opposed to bank services, the putative benefit at issue in that case.

Holding that a recognition clause defines which particular people are subject to the contract

Holding that “safety rules and practices ... are undoubtedly conditions of employment, and ... Section 8(d) requires good faith bargaining as a mutual obligation of the employer and the Union in connection with such matters”