§

Pressroom Cleaners, Inc.

34-CA-071823 (N.L.R.B. Mar. 29, 2013)
Pressroom Cleaners, Inc.

15 Cited authorities

  1. Fall River Dyeing & Finishing Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    482 U.S. 27 (1987)   Cited 369 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the new employer must bargain with the old union, if the new employer is a true successor, and discussing factors

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Burns International Security Services, Inc.

    406 U.S. 272 (1972)   Cited 478 times   49 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a successor is not bound to substantive terms of previous collective bargaining agreement

  3. Howard Johnson Co. v. Detroit Local Joint Exec. Bd., Hotel & Rest. Emps. & Bartenders Int'l Union, AFL-CIO

    417 U.S. 249 (1974)   Cited 366 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding under NLRA that purchaser of hotel assets was not required to arbitrate with union about its decision not to hire all of seller’s employees

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Grand Canyon Mining Co.

    116 F.3d 1039 (4th Cir. 1997)   Cited 36 times   1 Legal Analyses

    No. 96-1990, 96-2089. Argued May 7, 1997. Decided June 27, 1997. On Application for Enforcement and Cross-Petition for Review of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. (11-CA-15801, 11-CA-16059). ARGUED: Jeffrey Lawrence Horowitz, NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Matthew Woodruff Sawchak, SMITH, HELMS, MULLISS MOORE, L.L.P., Raleigh, North Carolina, for Respondent. ON BRIEF: Frederick L. Feinstein, General Counsel, Linda Sher, Associate General Counsel, Aileen

  5. Kallmann v. N.L.R.B

    640 F.2d 1094 (9th Cir. 1981)   Cited 63 times
    Holding that an employer could not be compelled to pay a greater amount of back-pay than the amount the employer would have paid its employees in the absence of the unfair labor practice

  6. Brown Root, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    333 F.3d 628 (5th Cir. 2003)   Cited 22 times
    Stating that the test "is whether the employer's questions, threats or statements tend to be coercive, not whether the employees are in fact coerced"

  7. Williams Enterprises v. N.L.R.B

    956 F.2d 1226 (D.C. Cir. 1992)   Cited 36 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Remanding to Board for determination of whether bargaining demand coincided with hiring of substantial and representative complement; successor immediately rehired nearly twenty percent of predecessor's employees and then "continually increased the size of its production staff" throughout next two months

  8. Capital Cleaning Contractors, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    147 F.3d 999 (D.C. Cir. 1998)   Cited 27 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Upholding finding of anti-union animus based on company vice-president's statements that he did not want to hire union members

  9. Matter of Chicago, M., St. P. Pac. R. Co.

    658 F.2d 1149 (7th Cir. 1981)   Cited 47 times

    Nos. 80-1347, 80-1348, 80-1545 and 80-1546. Argued December 8, 1980. Decided August 17, 1981. John O'B Clarke, Jr., Washington, D.C., for intervenor. Lawrence S. Adelson, Chicago, Ill., Mark J. Fritz, Billig, Sher Jones, P. C., Ellen A. Efros, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. Before SPRECHER and WOOD, Circuit Judges, and BROWN, Senior District Judge. The Honorable Wesley E. Brown, Senior District Judge of the United

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Advanced Stretchforming Intern

    233 F.3d 1176 (9th Cir. 2000)   Cited 19 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Board is entitled to summary enforcement of unchallenged rulings