Presidio Amenities Maintenance Association, Inc.
2 Cited authorities
In re Chemical Dynamics, Inc.
839 F.2d 1569 (Fed. Cir. 1988) Cited 14 timesConcluding that generalized sales and advertising figures do not establish secondary meaning where the alleged mark is not promoted by itself but instead as part of a larger mark or with other designs or marks
Daimler-Benz Aktiengesellschaft v. Consulting Engineers Council
353 F.2d 539 (C.C.P.A. 1965) Cited 1 timesPatent Appeal No. 7495. December 16, 1965. Von Maltitz, Derenberg, Kunin Janssen, Walter J. Derenberg, New York City (Horst Von Maltitz, Louis Kunin, New York City, of counsel), for appellant. Robert G. McMorrow, Washington, D.C. (James Atkins, Russell L. Law, Washington, D.C., of counsel), for appellee. Before WORLEY, Chief Judge, and RICH, MARTIN, SMITH and ALMOND, Judges. ALMOND, Judge. Daimler-Benz Aktiengesellschaft, hereinafter Benz, appeals from the decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal