§

Pittsburgh Post Gazette

06-CA-233676 (N.L.R.B. Sep. 14, 2020)
Pittsburgh Post Gazette

7 Cited authorities

  1. Litton Financial Printing Division v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    501 U.S. 190 (1991)   Cited 801 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that where a court must determine the validity of an arbitration agreement, it "cannot avoid that duty" just because the court must decide an issue on the merits

  2. Labor Board v. Katz

    369 U.S. 736 (1962)   Cited 712 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

  3. First National Maintenance Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    452 U.S. 666 (1981)   Cited 270 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer has no duty to bargain over a decision to shut down part of its business purely for economic reasons

  4. Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Labor Board

    313 U.S. 177 (1941)   Cited 873 times
    Holding that the NLRA limits the Board's backpay authority to restoring “actual losses”

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Acme Industrial Co.

    385 U.S. 432 (1967)   Cited 265 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Approving "discovery-type standard"

  6. KLB Industries, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    700 F.3d 551 (D.C. Cir. 2012)   Cited 2 times   1 Legal Analyses

    Nos. 11–1280 11–1322. 2012-12-4 KLB INDUSTRIES, INC., doing business as National Extrusion and Manufacturing Co., Petitioner v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, UAW, Intervenor. On Petition for Review and Cross–Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Kerry P. Hastings argued the cause and filed the briefs for petitioner. David Seid, Attorney, National Labor

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Litton Financial Printing

    893 F.2d 1128 (9th Cir. 1990)   Cited 9 times

    Nos. 88-7065, 88-7079. Argued and Submitted January 11, 1989. Decided January 16, 1990. David A. Fleischer, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner, respondent. David A. Rosenfeld, Van Bourg, Weinberg, Roger Rosenfeld, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner-intervenor. M.J. Diederich, Beverly Hills, Cal., for respondent. Application for Enforcement and Petition for Review of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before FARRIS, BOOCHEVER and HALL, Circuit Judges. CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, Circuit