§

Phoenix Pipe & Tube Co.

302 N.L.R.B. 122 (N.L.R.B. 1991)
Phoenix Pipe & Tube Co.

11 Cited authorities

  1. Fall River Dyeing & Finishing Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    482 U.S. 27 (1987)   Cited 372 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the new employer must bargain with the old union, if the new employer is a true successor, and discussing factors

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Burns International Security Services, Inc.

    406 U.S. 272 (1972)   Cited 481 times   50 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a successor is not bound to substantive terms of previous collective bargaining agreement

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Curtin Matheson Scientific, Inc.

    494 U.S. 775 (1990)   Cited 178 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Board has "considerable deference" in determining the legal rule to apply and should be upheld "as long as it is rational and consistent with the Act"

  4. City of Pittsburgh v. Sullivan

    484 U.S. 849 (1987)   Cited 92 times
    Adopting Title VII's standards for assessing sex discrimination under Title IX

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Jeffries Lithograph Co.

    752 F.2d 459 (9th Cir. 1985)   Cited 49 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding continuity where successor retained essentially same workforce in same plant doing same jobs under same supervisor with some of the same equipment, providing similar services

  6. Premium Foods, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    709 F.2d 623 (9th Cir. 1983)   Cited 32 times
    Holding that employees' requests for withdrawal cards, even if such requests indicated that the employees no longer wished to be members of the union, did “not necessarily indicate that [they] no longer wish to be represented by it”

  7. Systems Management, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    901 F.2d 297 (3d Cir. 1990)   Cited 15 times
    Holding that definition of "successor employer" appropriately depended, in that context, on a finding that the "majority of the employees of the former enterprise were hired by the new employer"

  8. Destileria Serrales, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    882 F.2d 19 (1st Cir. 1989)   Cited 13 times

    No. 88-1659. Argued March 1, 1989. Decided August 16, 1989. Francisco Chevere with whom Donald M. Hall and McConnell Valdes Kelley Sifre Griggs Ruiz-Suria, Hato Rey, P.R., were on brief, for petitioner. William R. Stewart, Deputy Asst. Gen. Counsel, with whom Rosemary M. Collyer, Gen. Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Associate Gen. Counsel, and Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., were on brief, for respondent. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Pennco, Inc.

    684 F.2d 340 (6th Cir. 1982)   Cited 18 times

    No. 80-1654. March 16, 1982. Rehearing Denied April 8, 1982. Certiorari Denied November 8, 1982. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., David Fleischer, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Gregory L. Monge, Van Antwerp, Hughes, Monge Jones, Ashland, Ky., for respondent. Before BROWN and KENNEDY, Circuit Judges and CHURCHILL, District Judge. The Honorable James P. Churchill, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, sitting by designation. ORDER The Board petitions

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Middleboro Fire Apparatus, Inc.

    590 F.2d 4 (1st Cir. 1978)   Cited 17 times

    No. 78-1173. Argued October 4, 1978. Decided December 20, 1978. Alan Banov, Atty., Washington, D.C., with whom John S. Irving, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Acting Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, and Peter M. Bernstein, Atty., Washington, D.C., were on brief, for petitioner. Lawrence M. Siskind, Brockton, Mass., with whom Ann-Louise Levine, Brockton, Mass., was on brief, for respondent. Petition from National Labor