Pfizer, Inc. v. Gregg Hamer-schlag

7 Cited authorities

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett

    477 U.S. 317 (1986)   Cited 221,438 times   41 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a movant's summary judgment motion should be granted "against a [nonmovant] who fails to make a showing sufficient to establish the existence of an element essential to that party's case, and on which that party will bear the burden of proof at trial"
  2. Hurwitz v. Sher

    508 U.S. 912 (1993)   Cited 142 times
    Holding that the unavailability, absent compulsory process, of a witness would result in "serious injustice," thus was a sufficient factor in granting the forum non conveniens motion
  3. Sinskey v. Pharmacia Ophthalmics, Inc.

    982 F.2d 494 (Fed. Cir. 1992)   Cited 60 times
    Holding that "[t]he trial court properly disregarded the declaration in assessing the existence of a genuine issue of material fact"
  4. Copelands' Enterprises, Inc. v. CNV, Inc.

    945 F.2d 1563 (Fed. Cir. 1991)   Cited 25 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that PTO may deny registration if applicant has deceived consumers or competitors
  5. Rule 56 - Summary Judgment

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 56   Cited 337,500 times   161 Legal Analyses
    Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit
  6. Rule 15 - Amended and Supplemental Pleadings

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 15   Cited 95,009 times   92 Legal Analyses
    Finding that, per N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 1024, New York law provides a more forgiving principle for relation back in the context of naming John Doe defendants described with particularity in the complaint
  7. Rule 37 - Failure to Make Disclosures or to Cooperate in Discovery; Sanctions

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 37   Cited 48,240 times   336 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a party may be barred from using a witness if it fails to disclose the witness