§

Penn Pipe & Supply Co., Inc.

208 N.L.R.B. 9 (N.L.R.B. 1973)
Penn Pipe & Supply Co., Inc.

9 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,036 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  2. Republic Aviation Corp. v. Board

    324 U.S. 793 (1945)   Cited 495 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding an absence of special circumstances where employer failed to introduce evidence of "unusual circumstances involving their plants."

  3. Labor Board v. Parts Co.

    375 U.S. 405 (1964)   Cited 213 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”

  4. Franks Bros. Co. v. Labor Board

    321 U.S. 702 (1944)   Cited 252 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing the legitimacy of the Board's view that the unlawful refusal to bargain collectively with employees' chosen representative disrupts employee morale, deters organizational activities, and discourages membership in unions.

  5. Joy Silk Mills v. National Labor Rel. Board

    185 F.2d 732 (D.C. Cir. 1950)   Cited 162 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Joy Silk the Court held that when an employer could have no doubt as to the majority status or when an employer refuses recognition of a union "due to a desire to gain time and to take action to dissipate the union's majority, the refusal is no longer justifiable and constitutes a violation of the duty to bargain set forth in section 8(a)(5) of the Act".

  6. Snow v. N.L.R.B

    308 F.2d 687 (9th Cir. 1962)   Cited 30 times
    In Snow, both the employer and the Union chose the clergyman who ran the check and he compared signatures, not just names.

  7. Walls Manufacturing Company v. N.L.R.B

    321 F.2d 753 (D.C. Cir. 1963)   Cited 23 times
    Holding that complaint to state health department was protected conduct given lack of evidence that "the allegations were made with intent to falsify or maliciously injure the [employer]"

  8. N.L.R.B. v. J.H. RUTTER REX MANUFACTURING CO

    415 F.2d 1133 (6th Cir. 1969)   Cited 3 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. J.H. Rutter Rex Mfg. Co., 415 F.2d 1133, this Court enforced certain parts of the Board's original order reported at 164 N.L.R.B. No. 5. The cause was remanded to the Board for further findings with respect to the alleged violations of § 8(a)(5), in the light of N.L.R.B. v. Gissel Packing Co., 395 U.S. 575, 89 S.Ct. 1918, 23 L.Ed.2d 547.

  9. Mount Hope Finishing v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    211 F.2d 365 (4th Cir. 1954)   Cited 12 times

    Nos. 6666, 6690. Argued January 5, 1954. Decided March 15, 1954. Thornton H. Brooks, Greensboro, N.C. (Gerard D. Reilly, Washington, D.C., Walter G. Powers, Taunton, Mass., C.E. Rhetts and Charles E. Hewes, Washington, D.C., on brief), for the companies and individuals. Owsley Vose, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. General Counsel, and Mary E. Williamson, Attorney, National