§

Pecheur Lozenge Co., Inc.

98 N.L.R.B. 496 (N.L.R.B. 1952)
Pecheur Lozenge Co., Inc.

9 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Mackay Co.

    304 U.S. 333 (1938)   Cited 535 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer may replace striking workers with others to carry on business so long as the employer is not guilty of unfair labor practices

  2. Franks Bros. Co. v. Labor Board

    321 U.S. 702 (1944)   Cited 252 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing the legitimacy of the Board's view that the unlawful refusal to bargain collectively with employees' chosen representative disrupts employee morale, deters organizational activities, and discourages membership in unions.

  3. Jeffery-De Witt Insulator Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    91 F.2d 134 (4th Cir. 1937)   Cited 80 times
    In Jeffery-DeWitt Insulator Co. v. NLRB, 4 Cir., 91 F.2d 134, 139-140, 112 A.L.R. 948 (Parker, J.), there was bargaining followed by a strike resulting in a closing of the plant.

  4. American Newspaper Pub. v. N.L.R.B

    193 F.2d 782 (7th Cir. 1951)   Cited 38 times
    In American Newspaper, the complaint clearly described the action that was alleged to constitute the unfair labor practice.

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Wiltse

    188 F.2d 917 (6th Cir. 1951)   Cited 27 times

    No. 11128. Decided March 23, 1951. As Amended on Rehearing June 1, 1951. Duane Beeson, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, David P. Findling, A. Norman Somers, Bernard Dunau, and Duane Beeson, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. George Meader, Washington, D.C. (George Meader, Washington, D.C., John S. Dobson, Ann Arbor, Mich., on the brief), for respondent. Before SIMONS, McALLISTER and MILLER, Circuit Judges. McALLISTER, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board filed its petition

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Clausen

    188 F.2d 439 (3d Cir. 1951)   Cited 23 times

    No. 10374. Argued March 6, 1951. Filed April 2, 1951. Rehearing Denied June 8, 1951. George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel (Fannie M. Boyls, and Samuel M. Singer, all of Washington, D.C., on the brief), for National Labor Relations Board. Irving Herman, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Conrad A. Falvello, Hazelton, Pa., for respondent. Rocco C. Falvello, Hazleton, Pa., on the brief, for respondent-appellee. Before MARIS, McLAUGHLIN

  7. West Texas Utilities v. National Labor R. BD

    184 F.2d 233 (D.C. Cir. 1950)   Cited 22 times
    In West Texas Utilities Co. v. National Labor R. Bd., 87 U.S.App.D.C. 179, 184 F.2d 233, 239, the District of Columbia Court said: "The failure of union officers to comply with 9(h) does not in any way relieve an employer of the paramount obligation to bargain collectively in good faith.

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Augusta Chemical Co.

    187 F.2d 63 (5th Cir. 1951)   Cited 13 times

    No. 13359. February 13, 1951. Fannie M. Boyls, Attorney, N.L.R.B., David P. Findling, Assoc. Gen. Cnsl., N.L.R.B. and A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Cnsl., N.L.R.B., all of Washingston, D.C., for petitioner. W.M. Fulcher, Augusta, Ga., for respondent. Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and McCORD and BORAH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. In this case the labor union involved in the controversy at the plant had not complied with Sec. 9(f), (g), and (h) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, 29 U

  9. Cathey v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    189 F.2d 428 (5th Cir. 1951)   Cited 4 times
    In Cathey v. National Labor Relations Board, 5 Cir., 189 F.2d 428, a petition for enforcement of an order of the Labor Board was denied and the complaint dismissed by the Court of Appeals, where the union concerned had failed to comply with the non-Communist affidavit provisions of the Act.