Paula R. Manning, Complainant,v.John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionAug 7, 2008
0120082643 (E.E.O.C. Aug. 7, 2008)

0120082643

08-07-2008

Paula R. Manning, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Paula R. Manning,

Complainant,

v.

John E. Potter,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120082643

Agency No. 4J493001608

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the

agency's decision dated April 29, 2008, dismissing her complaint of

unlawful employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the

Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e

et seq. Upon review, the Commission finds that complainant's complaint

was improperly dismissed pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(2) for

untimely EEO counselor contact.. In her complaint, complainant alleged

that she was subjected to discrimination on the basis of reprisal for

prior protected EEO activity under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of

1964 when (1) in September 2007, a co-worker received a cash award and

complainant was not recognized for her significant contributions; and

(2) when complainant was not given notice that a bid job was posted.

The agency dismissed both claims for failure to contact an EEO counselor

in a timely manner. Complainant contacted the EEO counselor on December

29, 2007, and asserted that she did not find out about the co-worker's

award until the week of December 17, 2007. EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. �

1614.105(a)(1) requires that complaints of discrimination should be

brought to the attention of the Equal Employment Opportunity Counselor

within forty-five (45) days of the date of the matter alleged to be

discriminatory or, in the case of a personnel action, within forty-five

(45) days of the effective date of the action. The Commission has

adopted a "reasonable suspicion" standard (as opposed to a "supportive

facts" standard) to determine when the forty-five (45) day limitation

period is triggered. See Howard v. Department of the Navy, EEOC Request

No. 05970852 (February 11, 1999). Thus, the time limitation is not

triggered until a complainant reasonably suspects discrimination, but

before all the facts that support a charge of discrimination have become

apparent.

EEOC Regulations provide that the agency or the Commission shall extend

the time limits when the individual shows that she was not notified of the

time limits and was not otherwise aware of them, that she did not know

and reasonably should not have known that the discriminatory matter or

personnel action occurred, that despite due diligence she was prevented by

circumstances beyond her control from contacting the Counselor within the

time limits, or for other reasons considered sufficient by the agency or

the Commission. In the instant case, complainant explained that she had

no way of knowing that the co-worker got the award since the agency did

not announce the award. The agency has not explained how complainant would

have found out about the award sooner. As such, the Commission finds

that complainant timely raised the claim (1) concerning the cash award.

With respect to the claim concerning the posting of a job for bid,

complainant disputes the agency's date of May 29, 2007. In her appeal she

explains that the position should have been posted in November and when it

wasn't, she raised the issue with the union and postmaster. In any event,

complainant stated that the position was put up for bid, complainant

bid on it, and she was placed into the position on February 2, 2008.

To the extent complainant is complaining of the bidding process, such

matter should be addressed within the negotiated grievance process. The

Commission has no jurisdiction over such matters. Claim 2 is dismissed

for failure to state a claim. See Diaz v. Department of the Air Force,

EEOC Request No. 05931049 (April 21, 1994).

Accordingly, the agency's final decision dismissing complainant's

complaint is reversed in part and affirmed in part. Claim 1 is hereby

remanded to the agency for further processing in accordance with this

decision and the Order below.

ORDER (E0408)

The agency is ordered to process the remanded claim 1 in accordance with

29 C.F.R. � 1614.108. The agency shall acknowledge to the complainant

that it has received the remanded claims within thirty (30) calendar

days of the date this decision becomes final. The agency shall issue

to complainant a copy of the investigative file and also shall notify

complainant of the appropriate rights within one hundred fifty (150)

calendar days of the date this decision becomes final, unless the matter

is otherwise resolved prior to that time. If the complainant requests a

final decision without a hearing, the agency shall issue a final decision

within sixty (60) days of receipt of complainant's request.

A copy of the agency's letter of acknowledgment to complainant and a

copy of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of

rights must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0408)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The

report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to

the complainant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's

order, the complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement

of the order. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The complainant also has the

right to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's

order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement.

See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g).

Alternatively, the complainant has the right to file a civil action on

the underlying complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled

"Right to File A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408.

A civil action for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying

complaint is subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c)

(1994 & Supp. IV 1999). If the complainant files a civil action, the

administrative processing of the complaint, including any petition for

enforcement, will be terminated. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0408)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (T0408)

This decision affirms the agency's final decision/action in part, but it

also requires the agency to continue its administrative processing of a

portion of your complaint. You have the right to file a civil action in

an appropriate United States District Court within ninety (90) calendar

days from the date that you receive this decision on both that portion

of your complaint which the Commission has affirmed and that portion

of the complaint which has been remanded for continued administrative

processing. In the alternative, you may file a civil action after

one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date you filed your

complaint with the agency, or your appeal with the Commission, until

such time as the agency issues its final decision on your complaint.

If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the

complaint the person who is the official agency head or department head,

identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work. If you file

a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0408)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

August 7, 2008

__________________

Date

2

0120082643

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P. O. Box 19848

Washington, D.C. 20036

5

0120082643