§

Pacific Industries, Inc.

134 N.L.R.B. 10 (N.L.R.B. 1961)
Pacific Industries, Inc.

5 Cited authorities

  1. Republic Aviation Corp. v. Board

    324 U.S. 793 (1945)   Cited 495 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding an absence of special circumstances where employer failed to introduce evidence of "unusual circumstances involving their plants."

  2. Labor Board v. Babcock Wilcox Co.

    351 U.S. 105 (1956)   Cited 294 times   19 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Board could not require an employer to allow non-employee union representatives to enter the employer's parking lot

  3. Labor Board v. Steelworkers

    357 U.S. 357 (1958)   Cited 72 times
    In United Steelworkers, the Court warned that the NLRA "does not command that labor organizations as a matter of abstract law, under all circumstances, be protected in the use of every possible means of reaching the minds of individual workers, nor that they are entitled to use a medium of communication simply because the employer is using it."

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Marval Poultry Co.

    292 F.2d 454 (4th Cir. 1961)   Cited 1 times

    No. 8324. Argued June 20, 1961. Decided June 22, 1961. Allison W. Brown, Jr., Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and William J. Avrutis, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief), for petitioner. George V. Gardner, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before SOBELOFF, Chief Judge, and HAYNSWORTH and BOREMAN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. Marval Poultry Company, Inc., the operator of a poultry

  5. National Labor Rel. Board v. Burke Mach. Tool

    133 F.2d 618 (6th Cir. 1943)   Cited 6 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Burke Mach. Tool Co., 6 Cir., 133 F.2d 618, 621, we recognized that the Labor Board was privileged to infer that a loss of majority representation by a bargaining agency was inseparable from unfair labor practices of the employer.