§
Ohio Power Co.

10 Cited authorities

  1. Chemical Workers v. Pittsburgh Glass

    404 U.S. 157 (1971)   Cited 632 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding retirees are not "employees" within the bargaining unit

  2. Metropolitan Edison Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    460 U.S. 693 (1983)   Cited 314 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union may, under certain circumstances, waive members' NLRA rights

  3. N.L.R.B. v. U.S. Postal Service

    8 F.3d 832 (D.C. Cir. 1993)   Cited 51 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Upholding postal service's exercise of contractual right to reduce employees' hours in response to budget reduction

  4. American Federation of Television & Radio Artists v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    395 F.2d 622 (D.C. Cir. 1968)   Cited 103 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Applying Taft

  5. Chicago Tribune Co. v. N.L.R.B

    974 F.2d 933 (7th Cir. 1992)   Cited 22 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Ruling that where the contract defines the parties' rights as to mandatory subjects of bargaining, the contract will control

  6. N.L.R.B. v. United Technologies Corp.

    884 F.2d 1569 (2d Cir. 1989)   Cited 18 times   2 Legal Analyses

    Nos. 1095, 1096, Dockets 89-4003, 89-4009. Argued May 8, 1989. Decided September 13, 1989. Edward J. Dempsey, Director, Indus. Relations Labor Counsel, United Technologies Corp., Hartford, Conn., for respondent/intervenor United Technologies Corp. Judith P. Flower, Washington, D.C. (Barbara A. Atkin, Supervisory Attorney, Joseph E. Desio, Acting Gen. Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Associate Gen. Counsel, Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., of counsel), for

  7. Gannett Rochester Newspapers v. N.L.R.B

    988 F.2d 198 (D.C. Cir. 1993)   Cited 12 times
    Treating a contract provision excusing company from providing information the same as other provisions excusing the company from statutory bargaining obligations

  8. Int'l Broth. of Elec. Workers v. N.L.R.B

    795 F.2d 150 (D.C. Cir. 1986)   Cited 14 times
    Holding that a zipper clause similar in language to TCI and to the zipper clause in the present case was a waiver of past practice allowing the employer to unilaterally discontinue a forty-year past practice of Christmas bonuses

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Pepsi-Cola Distributing Co. of Tennessee, Inc.

    646 F.2d 1173 (6th Cir. 1981)   Cited 7 times

    No. 79-1314. Argued February 2, 1981. Decided May 1, 1981. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, John Ferguson, Joseph Norelli, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Curtis L. Mack, Director, Region 10, N.L.R.B., Atlanta, Ga., for petitioner. J. W. Alexander, Jr., Blakeney, Alexander Machen, Charlotte, N.C., for respondent. Petition from the National Labor Relations Board. Before EDWARDS, Chief Judge, BROWN, Circuit Judge, and BATTISTI, District Judge. Honorable Frank J. Battisti, Chief Judge, United

  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Entwistle Mfg. Co.

    120 F.2d 532 (4th Cir. 1941)   Cited 15 times

    No. 4770. June 10, 1941. On Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board to enforce its order against the Entwistle Manufacturing Company. Order modified and enforced. Walter B. Wilbur, of Washington, D.C., Atty., National Labor Relations Board (Robert B. Watts, Gen. Counsel, Laurence A. Knapp, Associate Gen. Counsel, Ernest A. Gross, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Sylvester Garrett, and William Stix, all of Washington, D.C., Attys