§

Oahu Refuse Collection Co., Inc.

212 N.L.R.B. 224 (N.L.R.B. 1974)
Oahu Refuse Collection Co., Inc.

18 Cited authorities

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    340 U.S. 474 (1951)   Cited 9,729 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,038 times   71 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Wyman-Gordon Co.

    394 U.S. 759 (1969)   Cited 814 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding invalid a legislative rule developed in agency adjudication

  4. Labor Board v. Nevada Copper Co.

    316 U.S. 105 (1942)   Cited 196 times
    Holding that "if the findings of the Board are supported by evidence the courts are not free to set them aside even though the Board could have drawn different inferences"

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Flomatic Corporation

    347 F.2d 74 (2d Cir. 1965)   Cited 50 times
    In NLRB v. Flomatic Corp., 347 F.2d 74, 76-77 (2 Cir. 1965), this court held that various promises of benefits and an invitation to deal directly with the company violated § 8(a)(1).

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Wagner Iron Works

    220 F.2d 126 (7th Cir. 1955)   Cited 48 times

    Nos. 11121, 11141. March 7, 1955. Rehearing Denied April 5, 1955. David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Maurice Alexandre, Atty., George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Bernard Dunau, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for N.L.R.B. Albert J. Goldberg, Milwaukee, Wis., for Bridge, Structural Ornamental Iron Workers Shopmen's Local 471 (AFL). Morris Karon, Milwaukee, Wis., for Wagner Iron Works. Max Raskin, Milwaukee, Wis., for International Union, United Automobile

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Ace Comb Co.

    342 F.2d 841 (8th Cir. 1965)   Cited 32 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Ace Comb Co., 342 F.2d 841 (8th Cir. 1965) and N.L.R.B. v. Bird Machine Co., 161 F.2d 589 (1st Cir. 1947), where instructions to supervisory employees not to make coercive statements did not relieve employer of imputed liability it is indicated that it might be otherwise if these instructions had been communicated to the employees.

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Soft Water Laundry, Inc.

    346 F.2d 930 (5th Cir. 1965)   Cited 26 times

    No. 21303. June 15, 1965. Richard P. Lawlor, Atty., Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Warren M. Davison, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Jesse S. Hogg, Tampa, Fla., Fowler, White, Gillen, Humkey Trenam, Tampa, Fla., of counsel, for respondent. Before WISDOM and GEWIN, Circuit Judges, and BREWSTER, District Judge. GEWIN, Circuit Judge. The Board petitions for enforcement of an order issued against

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Ford

    170 F.2d 735 (6th Cir. 1948)   Cited 49 times

    No. 10605. November 15, 1948. On Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of an order of the board against Wilbur H. Ford and others, doing business as Ford Brothers. Decree of enforcement granted. Harold Cranefield, of Detroit, Mich., and Robert N. Denham, Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., of Washington, D.C. (David P. Finding, Ruth Weyand, and Thomas F. Maher, all of Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner

  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. S. Bleachery

    257 F.2d 235 (4th Cir. 1958)   Cited 33 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Stating that the essential inquiry is whether the employer shares the power of management