Nissan Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha

3 Cited authorities

  1. G. Heileman Brewing Co. v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.

    873 F.2d 985 (7th Cir. 1989)   Cited 121 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "L.A." was a descriptive abbreviation for the descriptive words "low alcohol" for beer and no secondary meaning was acquired
  2. Anheuser-Busch Inc. v. Stroh Brewery Co.

    750 F.2d 631 (8th Cir. 1984)   Cited 60 times
    Holding "L.A." suggestive of low alcohol beer
  3. Modern Optics v. Univis Lens Company

    234 F.2d 504 (C.C.P.A. 1956)   Cited 10 times
    In Modern Optics v. Univis Lens Co., 234 F.2d 504, 43 C.C.P.A. 970, (1956), the court concluded that "CV" was a valid trademark even though it was composed of the initials of the words "continuous vision" which were alleged to be descriptive of trifocal lenses.