Newspaper and Mail Deliverers' Union (New York Post)

8 Cited authorities

Communications Workers of America v. Beck
487 U.S. 735 (1988) Cited 278 times 45 Legal Analyses
Holding that non-members could not be charged "to support union activities beyond those germane to collective bargaining, contract administration, and grievance adjustment"
Radio Officers v. Labor Board
347 U.S. 17 (1954) Cited 471 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that "[t]he policy of the Act is to insulate employees' jobs from their organizational rights"
Labor Board v. General Motors
373 U.S. 734 (1963) Cited 191 times 18 Legal Analyses
Holding that termination is also the appropriate sanction for failure to pay fees under an agency-shop clause
Jackson Hosp. Corp. v. N.L.R.B
647 F.3d 1137 (D.C. Cir. 2011) Cited 6 times
Explaining that “[l]ong ago” the NLRB “clarified” that an employee has no right to bring a witness to a meeting, the “sole purpose” of which is to deliver a predetermined warning
Patterson v. Newspaper Mail Del. U. of N.Y.
384 F. Supp. 585 (S.D.N.Y. 1974) Cited 19 times
In Patterson, however, the court acknowledged that its position was somewhat unique, and additionally the necessity for factual findings arose due to that circuit's standards in Title VII cases.
N.L.R.B. v. New York Typographical Union
632 F.2d 171 (2d Cir. 1980) Cited 8 times
No. 612, Docket 79-4126. Argued March 5, 1980. Decided September 3, 1980. Joseph A. Oertel, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (John G. Elligers, Atty.; Norton J. Come, Acting Gen. Counsel; John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel; Robert E. Allen, Acting Associate Gen. Counsel; Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief), for petitioner. Marc J. Luxemburg, New York City (Harold L. Luxemburg, Luxemburg Luxemburg, P. C., New York City, on brief), for intervenors
N.L.R.B. v. Iron Workers Local 118
720 F.2d 1031 (9th Cir. 1983) Cited 2 times 1 Legal Analyses
No. 81-7682. Argued and Submitted February 15, 1983. Decided November 15, 1983. Jolane Ann Findley, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. David A. Rosenfeld, Van Bourg, Allen, Weinberg Roger, San Francisco, Cal., for respondent. Petition for Enforcement of the Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before GOODWIN, TANG and FARRIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. The National Labor Relations Board petitions for enforcement of an order based on its finding that the Union committed an unfair
N.L.R.B. v. Whiting Milk Corp.
342 F.2d 8 (1st Cir. 1965) Cited 13 times
In Whiting, we construed a clause in a multi-employer collective bargaining agreement which provided in substance that "in the event of acquisition by a signatory company of another Union company the seniority of the Union employees of the latter carried over into the acquiring company."

Newspaper and Mail Deliverers' Union (New York Post)

8 Cited authorities

Holding that non-members could not be charged "to support union activities beyond those germane to collective bargaining, contract administration, and grievance adjustment"

Holding that "[t]he policy of the Act is to insulate employees' jobs from their organizational rights"

Holding that termination is also the appropriate sanction for failure to pay fees under an agency-shop clause

Explaining that “[l]ong ago” the NLRB “clarified” that an employee has no right to bring a witness to a meeting, the “sole purpose” of which is to deliver a predetermined warning

In Patterson, however, the court acknowledged that its position was somewhat unique, and additionally the necessity for factual findings arose due to that circuit's standards in Title VII cases.

In Whiting, we construed a clause in a multi-employer collective bargaining agreement which provided in substance that "in the event of acquisition by a signatory company of another Union company the seniority of the Union employees of the latter carried over into the acquiring company."