Nataliev.Bryant, Complainant, v. Michael Chertoff, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionMay 30, 2008
0120081430 (E.E.O.C. May. 30, 2008)

0120081430

05-30-2008

Natalie V. Bryant, Complainant, v. Michael Chertoff, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, Agency.


Natalie V. Bryant,

Complainant,

v.

Michael Chertoff,

Secretary,

Department of Homeland Security,

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120081430

Agency No. HS-07-CBP-002070-07011C

Hearing No. 410-2008-00069X

DECISION

Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405, the Commission accepts complainant's

appeal from a final agency action1 concerning her equal employment

opportunity (EEO) complaint alleging employment discrimination in

violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), as

amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq., Section 501 of the Rehabilitation

Act of 1973 (Rehabilitation Act), as amended, 29 U.S.C. � 791 et seq.,

and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA), as amended,

29 U.S.C. � 621 et seq.

In her EEO complaint, complainant alleged that the agency discriminated

against her based on race (Black), color (dark brown), national origin

(African-American), sex (female), age (over 40), disability (on-the-job

back, neck & knee injuries), and reprisal for prior EEO activity when

it did not select her for a Mission Support Specialist position in the

Customs and Border Protection agency of the U.S. Department of Homeland

Security.

An EEOC Administrative Judge (AJ) issued a decision dismissing2

complainant's claim with prejudice. Specifically, the AJ found

that complainant could not establish discrimination because she was

"not facially qualified" for the position and evidence showed that

nondiscriminatory factors prompted her ineligibility and resulting

non-selection. The AJ found that the agency showed that only Customs

and Border Protection employees were eligible for the Mission Support

Specialist vacancy and complainant was not such an employee.

After a review of the record in its entirety, including consideration

of all statements submitted on appeal, it is the decision of the Equal

Employment Opportunity Commission to AFFIRM the final agency action,

because the AJ's issuance of a decision without a hearing was appropriate

and a preponderance of the record evidence does not establish that

discrimination occurred.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0408)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0408)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the

defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0408)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time in

which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action must

be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right

to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

May 30, 2008

__________________

Date

1 We note that, on January 3, 2008, an EEOC Administrative Judge (AJ)

issued an Order dismissing complainant's complaint. The agency did

not issue a final order within 40 days of receipt of the AJ's dismissal

so the AJ's dismissal has become the final agency action. On appeal,

the agency submitted an opposition brief.

2 While the AJ granted the agency's "Motion to Dismiss", a fair reading

of the AJ's decision indicated that his decision was more in the nature of

an adjudication on the merits by summary judgment pursuant to 29 C.F.R. �

1614.109(g).

??

??

??

??

2

0120081430

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P. O. Box 19848

Washington, D.C. 20036

3

0120081430