Naperville Jeep/Dodge

23 Cited authorities

Metropolitan Edison Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
460 U.S. 693 (1983) Cited 313 times 8 Legal Analyses
Holding that a union may, under certain circumstances, waive members' NLRA rights
Radio Union v. Broadcast Serv
380 U.S. 255 (1965) Cited 327 times
Holding that two entities were a single employer and therefore that their gross receipts could be totaled together to establish jurisdiction under the National Labor Relations Act
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Acme Industrial Co.
385 U.S. 432 (1967) Cited 265 times 4 Legal Analyses
Approving "discovery-type standard"
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Browning-Ferris Industries of Pennsylvania, Inc.
691 F.2d 1117 (3d Cir. 1982) Cited 339 times 16 Legal Analyses
Holding that joint employer situation exists only when "two or more employers exert significant control over the same employees . . . [where] they share or co-determine those matters governing essential terms and conditions of employment"
Labor Board v. Deena Artware
361 U.S. 398 (1960) Cited 139 times
Ruling that derivative liability could be imposed on the basis of single employer status
California Pacific Medical v. N.L.R.B
87 F.3d 304 (9th Cir. 1996) Cited 26 times
No. 93-71039, 94-70009 Argued and Submitted August 15, 1995, San Francisco, California Filed June 19, 1996 Jerome B. Falk, Jr., Howard, Rice, Nemerovski, Canady, Robertson, Falk Rabkin, San Francisco, California, for the petitioner-respondent. Richard A. Cohen, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, DC, for the respondent-petitioner. On Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. NLRB No. 20-CA-24067. Before: BETTY B. FLETCHER, CECIL F. POOLE, and DIARMUID
Serramonte Oldsmobile, Inc. v. N.L.R.B
86 F.3d 227 (D.C. Cir. 1996) Cited 25 times 2 Legal Analyses
Concluding impasse was valid where "not a single one of the Union's statements . . . actually committed the Union to a new position or contained any specific proposals"
N.L.R.B. v. Emsing's Supermarket, Inc.
872 F.2d 1279 (7th Cir. 1989) Cited 32 times
Granting enforcement of an NLRB order to an employer to cease and desist from unfair labor practices, including failing to make certain contractual payments after a CBA's expiration, and noting that "[a]n employer may not make changes in the terms and conditions of employment reflected in an expired [CBA; i]nstead, the employer must maintain the status quo after the expiration of a [CBA] until a new agreement is reached or until the parties bargain in good faith to impasse"
Trident Seafoods, Inc. v. N.L.R.B
101 F.3d 111 (D.C. Cir. 1996) Cited 22 times
Collecting standards
Skyline Distributors v. N.L.R.B
99 F.3d 403 (D.C. Cir. 1996) Cited 18 times
Examining the record and reversing in part despite finding the Board's opinion "so lacking in evidentiary support and reasoned decisionmaking that it seems whimsical"

Naperville Jeep/Dodge

23 Cited authorities

Holding that a union may, under certain circumstances, waive members' NLRA rights

Holding that two entities were a single employer and therefore that their gross receipts could be totaled together to establish jurisdiction under the National Labor Relations Act

Approving "discovery-type standard"

Holding that joint employer situation exists only when "two or more employers exert significant control over the same employees . . . [where] they share or co-determine those matters governing essential terms and conditions of employment"

Ruling that derivative liability could be imposed on the basis of single employer status

Concluding impasse was valid where "not a single one of the Union's statements . . . actually committed the Union to a new position or contained any specific proposals"

Collecting standards

Examining the record and reversing in part despite finding the Board's opinion "so lacking in evidentiary support and reasoned decisionmaking that it seems whimsical"