§

Nada Grant, Appellant, v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

01984802 (E.E.O.C. Jun. 2, 1999)
Nada Grant, Appellant, v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Harris v. Forklift Sys., Inc.

    510 U.S. 17 (1993)   Cited 12,643 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "no single factor is required" to show a hostile work environment, including "whether [the acts are] physically threatening"

  2. Hishon v. King Spalding

    467 U.S. 69 (1984)   Cited 12,552 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the right of expression does not permit selecting law firm partners in violation of Title VII

  3. Section 2000e - Definitions

    42 U.S.C. § 2000e   Cited 52,470 times   130 Legal Analyses
    Granting EEOC authority to issue procedural regulations to carry out Title VII provisions

  4. Section 621 - Congressional statement of findings and purpose

    29 U.S.C. § 621   Cited 17,692 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Finding that "older workers find themselves disadvantaged in their efforts to retain employment, and especially to regain employment when displaced from jobs"

  5. Section 206 - Minimum wage

    29 U.S.C. § 206   Cited 9,056 times   101 Legal Analyses
    Asking only whether the alleged inequality resulted from “any other factor other than sex”

  6. Section 791 - Employment of individuals with disabilities

    29 U.S.C. § 791   Cited 2,303 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Adopting standards for ADA claims under § 501 of the Rehabilitation Act, including 42 U.S.C. § 12112, which forbids discrimination "against a qualified individual with a disability because of the disability . . ."