Motor City Sunroofs, Inc.
4 Cited authorities
Electronic Design Sales v. Electronic Sys
954 F.2d 713 (Fed. Cir. 1992) Cited 28 timesHolding that purchaser confusion is the "primary focus" and, in case of goods and services that are sold, "the inquiry generally will turn on whether actual or potential `purchasers' are confused"
Federated Foods v. Fort Howard Paper Co.
544 F.2d 1098 (C.C.P.A. 1976) Cited 16 times 1 Legal AnalysesStating that the mere existence of modern supermarket containing wide variety or products should not foreclose further inquiry into the likelihood of confusion arising from the use of similar marks on any goods so displayed
Interstate Brands v. Celestial Seasonings
576 F.2d 926 (C.C.P.A. 1978) Cited 12 timesFinding no error in the citation to third-party registrations
Canada Dry Corp. v. Am. Home Products Corp.
468 F.2d 207 (C.C.P.A. 1972) Cited 2 timesOctober 26, 1972. Francis J. Sullivan, attorney of record, for appellant. Mortimer Altin, Julius A. Bell, New York City, attorneys of record, for appellee. Appeal from the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. Before MARKEY, Chief Judge, and RICH, ALMOND, BALDWIN, and LANE, Judges. ALMOND, Judge. This is an appeal from a decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, 164 USPQ 154, dismissing appellant's opposition upon the ground that registration of the trademark in question is not reasonably likely