§

Morand Brothers Beverage Co., et al.

91 N.L.R.B. 409 (N.L.R.B. 1950)
Morand Brothers Beverage Co., et al.

10 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Mackay Co.

    304 U.S. 333 (1938)   Cited 535 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer may replace striking workers with others to carry on business so long as the employer is not guilty of unfair labor practices

  2. Labor Board v. Electric Cleaner Co.

    315 U.S. 685 (1942)   Cited 39 times

    CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 588. Argued March 5, 1942. Decided March 30, 1942. 1. The finding of the National Labor Relations Board that, by a supplementary oral contract between an employer and a labor union, it was agreed only that new employees would be required to join the union, was supported by substantial evidence. P. 690. 2. The conclusion of the Board that the closed-shop agreement between the employer and a labor union in this case was not valid

  3. Carter Carburetor Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    140 F.2d 714 (8th Cir. 1944)   Cited 30 times

    No. 12636. February 21, 1944. On Petition to Review and on Request for Enforcement of Order of National Labor Relations Board. Proceedings on petition of Carter Carburetor Corporation against the National Labor Relations Board to review an order of the board requiring petitioner to cease and desist from certain unfair labor practices and, on request of board, for enforcement of order. Petition denied and order enforced. William R. Gentry, of St. Louis, Mo. (N.A. Stancliffe and John L. Farrell, both

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Hopwood R. Co.

    98 F.2d 97 (2d Cir. 1938)   Cited 32 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Hopwood Retinning Co., 98 F.2d 97, the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit based its conclusion that a company engaged in repairing milk and ice cream containers was engaged in "interstate commerce" within the meaning of the Act upon the fact that 23% of the containers on which work was to be done were transported in the company's truck from and to states other than the state where the work was performed.

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Natl. Broadcasting

    150 F.2d 895 (2d Cir. 1945)   Cited 18 times

    No. 368. July 27, 1945. Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board pursuant to section 10(e) of the Wagner Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 160(e), for the enforcement of an order issued by the Board on March 31, 1945, requiring National Broadcasting Company, Inc., and American Broadcasting Company, Inc., respectively, to bargain collectively, upon request with National Association of Broadcast Engineers and Technicians. American Federation

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Star Pub. Co.

    97 F.2d 465 (9th Cir. 1938)   Cited 23 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Star Publishing Co., 9 Cir., 97 F.2d 465, branch managers were held to be employees, while in National Labor Relations Board v. American Potash Chemical Corp., 9 Cir., 98 F.2d 488, a foreman was reinstated upon the ground that he had been unfairly discharged.

  7. Nat. Labor Rel. Board v. Cape Co. Milling Co.

    140 F.2d 543 (8th Cir. 1944)   Cited 14 times

    No. 12718. February 14, 1944. On Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition for enforcement of an order of the National Labor Relations Board directing Cape County Milling Company to cease and desist from certain unfair labor practices, etc. Order enforced. Charles K. Hackler, Atty. for National Labor Relations Board, of Clayton, Mo. (Alvin J. Rockwell, Gen. Counsel, Howard Lichtenstein, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Jacob I. Karro and Maurice R. Kraines, Attys

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Barrett Co.

    135 F.2d 959 (7th Cir. 1943)   Cited 9 times

    No. 8226. June 2, 1943. Rehearing Denied June 24, 1943. Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board for the enforcement of its order against the Barrett Company. Judgment for the Board. Isaiah S. Dorfman, Robert B. Watts, Gen. Counsel, Ernest A. Gross, Associate Gen. Counsel, Howard Lichtenstein, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Ida Klaus and Fannie M. Boyls, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, all of Washington, D.C., for

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Piedmont Cotton

    179 F.2d 345 (5th Cir. 1950)   Cited 2 times

    No. 12864. January 30, 1950. Charles A. Kyle, Atty., Nat. Labor Relations Bd., New Orleans, La., A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. John Wesley Weekes, Decatur, Ga., Murphey Candler, Jr., Decatur, Ga., for respondent. Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge. and HOLMES and McCORD, Circuit Judges. HUTCHESON, Chief Judge. Petitioning for enforcement of its order, the board is here, by brief, appendix, and oral argument, insisting that

  10. National Labor Relations Bd. v. Algoma Net Co.

    124 F.2d 730 (7th Cir. 1941)   Cited 5 times

    No. 7689. December 9, 1941. Petition for the Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board against the Algoma Net Company for an enforcement of an order of the board requiring the Algoma Net Company to cease and desist from unfair labor practices, to reinstate employees with back pay, and to post appropriate notices. Petition granted. Robert B. Watts, of Washington, D.C., and I.S. Dorfman, of Chicago, Ill., for petitioner. Robert C.