§

Montgomery Ward & Co.

253 N.L.R.B. 196 (N.L.R.B. 1980)
Montgomery Ward & Co.

15 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,036 times   71 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  2. Labor Board v. Parts Co.

    375 U.S. 405 (1964)   Cited 213 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”

  3. Joy Silk Mills v. National Labor Rel. Board

    185 F.2d 732 (D.C. Cir. 1950)   Cited 162 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Joy Silk the Court held that when an employer could have no doubt as to the majority status or when an employer refuses recognition of a union "due to a desire to gain time and to take action to dissipate the union's majority, the refusal is no longer justifiable and constitutes a violation of the duty to bargain set forth in section 8(a)(5) of the Act".

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Eagle Material Handling, Inc.

    558 F.2d 160 (3d Cir. 1977)   Cited 36 times
    In Eagle Material, we held that a company violated the NLRA when it terminated an unpopular supervisor shortly before the union's representation election.

  5. Hedstrom Co. v. N.L.R.B

    558 F.2d 1137 (3d Cir. 1977)   Cited 32 times
    Holding statements made by low-level supervisor to be coercive

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Cumberland Shoe Corporation

    351 F.2d 917 (6th Cir. 1965)   Cited 49 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Cumberland we emphasized that "In no instance did any employee testify that he was told that the election was the only purpose of the card."

  7. Elec. Products Div. of Midland-Ross v. N.L.R.B

    617 F.2d 977 (3d Cir. 1980)   Cited 27 times
    In Electrical Products Division of Midland-Ross Corp. v. NLRB, 617 F.2d 977, 987 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 871, 101 S.Ct. 210, 66 L.Ed.2d 91 (1980), we referred to three elements as usually found in these cases where we enforced a Gissel II order: effect of the unfair labor practices on a significant portion of the bargaining unit, the participation of senior company officials, and the continuing impact of the same factors that undermined the first election.

  8. Frito-Lay, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    585 F.2d 62 (3d Cir. 1978)   Cited 23 times
    Reopening of uneconomic plant would cost one million dollars plus operating loss of several hundred thousand dollars a year

  9. Kenworth Trucks of Philadelphia v. N.L.R.B

    580 F.2d 55 (3d Cir. 1978)   Cited 17 times

    No. 77-1939. Argued February 24, 1978. Decided March 30, 1978. Resubmitted for Reconsideration June 3, 1978. Rehearing Denied August 11, 1978. D. Barry Gibbons, Gibbons, Buckley and Smith, Media, Pa., for petitioner. Elliott Moore, John S. Irving, Marion L. Griffin, Norman Moscowitz, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before ADAMS, HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges, and BECHTLE, District Judge. United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, sitting by designation. OPINION

  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Daybreak Lodge Nursing & Convalescent Home, Inc.

    585 F.2d 79 (3d Cir. 1978)   Cited 11 times

    No. 77-2270. Argued July 25, 1978. Decided October 17, 1978. As Amended December 5, 1978. Barry F. Bevacqua, Julius M. Steiner, Pechner, Dorfman, Wolffe, Rounick Cabot, Philadelphia, Pa., for respondent. Elliott Moore, Madge F. Jefferson, Robert Sewell, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Before ADAMS, WEIS and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges. OPINION OF THE COURT A. LEON HIGGINBOTHAM, Jr., Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board (Board) has filed suit pursuant to 10(e) of the National