478 U.S. 265 (1986) Cited 17,390 times 6 Legal Analyses
Holding that Ex parte Young would not support a suit against a state for ongoing liability for an alleged past breach of trust, since "continuing payment of the income from the lost corpus is essentially equivalent in economic terms to a one-time restoration of the lost corpus itself"
Holding that the exhaustion requirement would be rendered meaningless if any improper denial of benefits constituted a breach of fiduciary duty under ERISA, since employees could avoid the requirement simply by characterizing their claims for benefits as claims for breach of fiduciary duty
Holding inadequate notice similar to that excerpted above because it failed to inform of the consequences of default or specify that evidence must be in the form of sworn affidavits
658 F. Supp. 2d 700 (E.D.N.C. 2009) Cited 13 times
Finding that decision to deny employee training in "Driving Instructors School" or Spanish language was not actionable because it did not impact the plaintiff's "pay, benefits, or employment"