§

Michael C. Adams, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, (Southeast Area) Agency.

01-2007-2060_Adams (E.E.O.C. Aug. 29, 2008)
Michael C. Adams, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, (Southeast Area) Agency.

2 Cited authorities

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    340 U.S. 474 (1951)   Cited 9,673 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "

  2. Pullman-Standard v. Swint

    456 U.S. 273 (1982)   Cited 1,625 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[w]hen an appellate court discerns that a district court has failed to make a finding because of an erroneous view of the law, the usual rule is that there should be a remand for further proceedings to permit the trial court to make the missing findings"