312 U.S. 426 (1941) Cited 506 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that "the mere fact that a court has found that a defendant has committed an act in violation of a statute does not justify an injunction broadly to obey the statute"
Rejecting respondent's argument that relief should be limited only to plants where violations had occurred because respondent "had instituted a system-wide and centrally directed and coordinated movement to commit unfair labor practices"