§

Meaden Screw Products Co.

336 N.L.R.B. 298 (N.L.R.B. 2001)
Meaden Screw Products Co.

7 Cited authorities

  1. Pierce v. Underwood

    487 U.S. 552 (1988)   Cited 9,295 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Holding that when Congress reenacts a statute without changing its language, and when there is no indication that “Congress thought it was doing anything ... except reenacting and making permanent” the earlier legislation, a court should not give weight to legislative history pertaining to the reenactment

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 652 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  4. Royal Development Co., Ltd. v. N.L.R.B

    703 F.2d 363 (9th Cir. 1983)   Cited 18 times

    Nos. 81-7638, 81-7736. Argued and Submitted August 9, 1982. Decided February 22, 1983. Robert Katz, Jeffrey Harris, Honolulu, Hawaii, for petitioner/cross-respondent. William R. Stewart, Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent/cross-petitioner. On Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before CHAMBERS and WALLACE, Circuit Judges, and JAMESON, District Judge. Honorable William J. Jameson, United States District Judge, District of Montana, sitting

  5. Inter-Neighborhood Housing v. National Labor

    124 F.3d 115 (2d Cir. 1997)   Cited 3 times
    Finding lack of substantial justification where, in declining to investigate further, agency investigator must have concluded that a witness was lying and falsifying documents, but where administrative record included "no basis for such conclusions"

  6. Europlast, Ltd. v. N.L.R.B

    33 F.3d 16 (7th Cir. 1994)   Cited 4 times   1 Legal Analyses

    No. 93-2675. Argued March 31, 1994. Decided August 17, 1994. John C. Patzke (argued), Albert H. Petajan, Brigden Petajan, Milwaukee, WI, for petitioner. John C. Truesdale, Abby Propis Simms, Anne P. Pomerantz (argued), N.L.R.B., Contempt Litigation Branch, Aileen A. Armstrong, N.L.R.B., Appellate Court, Enforcement Litigation, Washington, DC, Joseph A. Szabo, Director, N.L.R.B., Region 30, Milwaukee, WI, Margery E. Lieber, N.L.R.B., Special Litigation, Washington, DC, for respondent. Petition for

  7. Section 504 - Costs and fees of parties

    5 U.S.C. § 504   Cited 657 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Authorizing payment of attorney's fees by the Government when a party prevails in a federal agency adjudication