§
Matter of I-S

10 Cited authorities

  1. INS v. Cardoza-Fonseca

    480 U.S. 421 (1987)   Cited 2,410 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the phrase "well-founded fear," which is also found in 8 U.S.C. § 1101, is ambiguous

  2. INS v. Aguirre-Aguirre

    526 U.S. 415 (1999)   Cited 811 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the BIA has authority to interpret ambiguous statutes

  3. Lanza v. Ashcroft

    389 F.3d 917 (9th Cir. 2004)   Cited 295 times
    Holding that a remand to the BIA is necessary where the IJ's decision is founded on a discretionary and nondiscretionary basis and the BIA affirms without an opinion

  4. Castellano-Chacon v. I.N.S.

    341 F.3d 533 (6th Cir. 2003)   Cited 176 times
    Holding modified by Almuhtaseb v. Gonzales, 453 F.3d 743 (6th Cir.2006)

  5. Huang v. Ashcroft

    390 F.3d 1118 (9th Cir. 2004)   Cited 42 times
    Holding that exhaustion is required under 28 U.S.C. § 2241

  6. Maguire v. Commissioner

    313 U.S. 1 (1941)   Cited 59 times
    Employing title of tax statute as evidence of congressional intent to confine application of its text to specific property owned by decedent at the time of death

  7. Section 1101 - Definitions

    8 U.S.C. § 1101   Cited 16,770 times   91 Legal Analyses
    Finding notice and comment rulemaking is required for the agency's interim rule recognizing fear of coercive family practices as basis for refugee status

  8. Section 1231 - Detention and removal of aliens ordered removed

    8 U.S.C. § 1231   Cited 7,991 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Concluding that once petitioner's removal order was reinstated, he was no longer eligible for "relief" in the form of adjustment of status-even if he could obtain a Form I-212 waiver

  9. Section 1240.11 - Ancillary matters, applications

    8 C.F.R. § 1240.11   Cited 182 times
    Requiring the immigration judge to inform an alien of his "apparent eligibility" for relief from removal

  10. Section 1240.12 - Decision of the immigration judge

    8 C.F.R. § 1240.12   Cited 30 times

    (a)Contents. The decision of the immigration judge may be oral or written. The decision of the immigration judge shall include a finding as to inadmissibility or deportability. The formal enumeration of findings is not required. The decision shall also contain reasons for granting or denying the request. The decision shall be concluded with the order of the immigration judge. (b)Summary decision. Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (a) of this section, in any case where inadmissibility or