Matter of E-R-M

12 Cited authorities

  1. United States v. Armstrong

    517 U.S. 456 (1996)   Cited 2,257 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that there was no evidence of selective prosecution where the prosecutor "explained in an affidavit that . . . several of the defendants had criminal histories including narcotics and firearms violations"
  2. United States v. Nixon

    418 U.S. 683 (1974)   Cited 4,152 times   18 Legal Analyses
    Holding appeal of District Court's denial of motion to quash subpoena duces tecum was in the Court of Appeals for purposes of § 1254
  3. Bordenkircher v. Hayes

    434 U.S. 357 (1978)   Cited 2,935 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding that plea bargaining does not violate the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination
  4. United States v. Batchelder

    442 U.S. 114 (1979)   Cited 1,742 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the imposition of different imprisonment terms under different, but partially overlapping, firearm-possession statutes does not violate equal protection
  5. Oyler v. Boles

    368 U.S. 448 (1962)   Cited 1,572 times
    Holding that "a defendant must receive reasonable notice and an opportunity to be heard relative to the recidivist charge even if due process does not require that notice be given prior to the trial on the substantive offense."
  6. United States v. Aguilar

    515 U.S. 593 (1995)   Cited 385 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "if the defendant lacks knowledge that his actions are likely to affect the judicial proceeding, he lacks the requisite intent to obstruct"
  7. Section 922 - Unlawful acts

    18 U.S.C. § 922   Cited 62,996 times   187 Legal Analyses
    Finding that "even before the sale of a firearm, the gun, its component parts, ammunition, and the raw materials from which they are made have considerably moved in interstate commerce"
  8. Section 1182 - Inadmissible aliens

    8 U.S.C. § 1182   Cited 9,905 times   69 Legal Analyses
    Holding deportable aliens who have been convicted of "crimes involving moral turpitude"
  9. Section 1229a - Removal proceedings

    8 U.S.C. § 1229a   Cited 6,400 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Granting a noncitizen the right to file one motion to reopen and providing that “the motion to reopen shall be filed within 90 days of the date of entry of a final administrative order of removal”
  10. Section 1225 - Inspection by immigration officers; expedited removal of inadmissible arriving aliens; referral for hearing

    8 U.S.C. § 1225   Cited 1,299 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Setting standard for credible fear as "a significant possibility, taking into account the ... statements made by the alien ... and such other facts as are known to the officer, that the alien could establish eligibility for asylum"
  11. Section 245.2 - Application

    8 C.F.R. § 245.2   Cited 500 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Granting USCIS authority to adjudicate applications for adjustment of status outside of removal proceedings
  12. Section 217.4 - Inadmissibility and deportability

    8 C.F.R. § 217.4   Cited 59 times
    Providing that removal of a VWP entrant "shall be effected without referral of the alien to an immigration judge for a determination of deportability"