Mario Diaz v. Servicios De Franquicia Pardo's S.A.C.

19 Cited authorities

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett

    477 U.S. 317 (1986)   Cited 220,711 times   41 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a movant's summary judgment motion should be granted "against a [nonmovant] who fails to make a showing sufficient to establish the existence of an element essential to that party's case, and on which that party will bear the burden of proof at trial"
  2. Sumitomo Shoji America, Inc. v. Avagliano

    457 U.S. 176 (1982)   Cited 285 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that American subsidiary of a Japanese parent had no Treaty defense because the subsidiary was not a "company of Japan"
  3. United States v. Stuart

    489 U.S. 353 (1989)   Cited 223 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the government's burden under § 7602(d) was satisfied by an IRS agent's affidavit
  4. Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Franklin Mint Corp.

    466 U.S. 243 (1984)   Cited 141 times
    Holding that Congress's repudiation of the gold standard, which offered the unit of account for enforcing a treaty, did not preclude an agency from continuing to adopt regulations for the treaty's enforcement
  5. Kolovrat v. Oregon

    366 U.S. 187 (1961)   Cited 167 times
    Recognizing that State Department's opinion on whether a crime is covered by a treaty is entitled to weight and deference
  6. Valentine v. U.S. ex Rel. Neidecker

    299 U.S. 5 (1936)   Cited 133 times
    Denying extradition after determining that "the treaty with France fails to grant the necessary authority"
  7. Havana Club Holding S.A. v. Galleon S.A

    203 F.3d 116 (2d Cir. 2000)   Cited 51 times
    Holding that the "related to" language of § 515.527 should be interpreted narrowly as it creates an exception to the broad prohibitions of the embargo
  8. Cook v. United States

    288 U.S. 102 (1933)   Cited 120 times
    Recognizing this principle, but finding it inapplicable where beyond the territorial limits placed upon the government's authority by treaty
  9. Emmpresa Cubana Del Tabaco v. Culbro Corp.

    213 F. Supp. 2d 247 (S.D.N.Y. 2002)   Cited 46 times
    Finding that where two marks are identical and used for the same product, consumer confusion is "inevitable"
  10. Person's Co., Ltd. v. Christman

    900 F.2d 1565 (Fed. Cir. 1990)   Cited 51 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that foreign use is not sufficient to establish priority rights even over a United States competitor who took mark in bad faith
  11. Rule 56 - Summary Judgment

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 56   Cited 336,290 times   161 Legal Analyses
    Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit
  12. Section 1126 - International conventions

    15 U.S.C. § 1126   Cited 185 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Stating that an application under § 44 "must state the applicant's bona fide intention to use the mark in commerce, but use in commerce shall not be required prior to registration"
  13. Section 95a, 95b - Omitted

    12 U.S.C. § 95a, 95b   Cited 150 times   3 Legal Analyses

    12 U.S.C. § 95a, 95b EDITORIAL NOTES CODIFICATIONSection 95a, act Oct. 6, 1917, ch. 106, §5(b), 40 Stat. 415; Sept. 24, 1918, ch. 176, §5, 40 Stat. 966; Mar. 9, 1933, ch. 1, title I, §2, 48 Stat. 1; May 7, 1940, ch. 185, §1, 54 Stat. 179; Dec. 18, 1941, ch. 593, title III, §301, 55 Stat. 839; Proc. No. 2695, eff. July 4, 1946, 11 F.R. 7517, 69 Stat. 1352; Pub. L. 95-223, title I, §§101(a), 102, 103(b), Dec. 28, 1977, 91 Stat. 1625, 1626; Pub. L. 100-418, title II, §2502(a)(1), Aug. 23, 1988, 102

  14. Section 6032 - Enforcement of economic embargo of Cuba

    22 U.S.C. § 6032   Cited 13 times
    Ordering the President to "instruct the Secretary of the Treasury and the Attorney General to enforce fully the Cuban Assets Control Regulations"
  15. Section 515.802 - Delegation by the Secretary of the Treasury

    31 C.F.R. § 515.802   Cited 5 times

    Any action under § 515.201 which the Secretary of the Treasury is authorized to take pursuant to Proclamation 3447 or the Trading With the Enemy Act may be taken by the Director, Office of Foreign Assets Control, or by any other person to whom the Secretary of the Treasury has delegated authority so to act. 31 C.F.R. §515.802 28 FR 6974, July 9, 1963. Redesignated at 62 FR 45106, Aug. 25, 1997