§

Margaret R. Johnson, Complainant, v. Tom Kilgore, President and Chief Executive Officer, Tennessee Valley Authority, Agency.

0120112731 (E.E.O.C. Oct. 14, 2011)
Margaret R. Johnson, Complainant, v. Tom Kilgore, President and Chief Executive Officer, Tennessee Valley Authority, Agency.

7 Cited authorities

  1. Section 2000e - Definitions

    42 U.S.C. § 2000e   Cited 52,526 times   130 Legal Analyses
    Granting EEOC authority to issue procedural regulations to carry out Title VII provisions

  2. Section 794 - Nondiscrimination under Federal grants and programs

    29 U.S.C. § 794   Cited 12,658 times   30 Legal Analyses
    Adopting ADA standards for Rehabilitation Act claims

  3. Section 791 - Employment of individuals with disabilities

    29 U.S.C. § 791   Cited 2,303 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Adopting standards for ADA claims under § 501 of the Rehabilitation Act, including 42 U.S.C. § 12112, which forbids discrimination "against a qualified individual with a disability because of the disability . . ."

  4. Section 1630.2 - Definitions

    29 C.F.R. § 1630.2   Cited 8,524 times   141 Legal Analyses
    Holding that major life activity is substantially limited if plaintiff is "significantly restricted in the ability to perform either a class of jobs or a broad range of jobs in various classes as compared to the average person having comparable training, skills and abilities"

  5. Section 1614.110 - Final action by agencies

    29 C.F.R. § 1614.110   Cited 229 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Compelling final decision “within 60 days of the end of the 30-day period for the complainant to request a hearing . . . where the complainant has not requested [one]”

  6. Section 1614.108 - Investigation of complaints

    29 C.F.R. § 1614.108   Cited 183 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Describing inquisitorial nature of investigation process

  7. Section 1614.405 - Decisions on appeals

    29 C.F.R. § 1614.405   Cited 83 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Providing that " decision [of the EEOC in an administrative appeal] is final . . . unless . . . [e]ither party files a timely request for reconsideration"