§

Manufacturers Woodworking Assn.

345 N.L.R.B. 538 (N.L.R.B. 2005)
Manufacturers Woodworking Assn.

9 Cited authorities

  1. Bill Johnson's Restaurants, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    461 U.S. 731 (1983)   Cited 980 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the NLRB could not bar an employer from pursuing a well-grounded lawsuit for damages under state law

  2. BEK CONSTR. CO. v. NLRB

    536 U.S. 516 (2002)   Cited 313 times   14 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the First Amendment right to petition the government extends to the courts

  3. National Woodwork Manufacturers Ass'n v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    386 U.S. 612 (1967)   Cited 392 times
    Holding that union employees' refusal to install third-party manufacturer's product was not prohibited under § 158(b)(B), because it was an action "pressuring the [union members'] employer for agreements regulating relations between [the employer] and his own employees"

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Enterprise Ass'n of Steam, Hot Water, Hydraulic Sprinkler, Pneumatic Tube, Ice Machine & General Pipefitters

    429 U.S. 507 (1977)   Cited 139 times
    Stating that if a union were to attempt to capture work it had previously acquiesced to non-union workers' performing, such conduct would serve "not to preserve, but to aggrandize, its own position and that of its members," concluding that "[s]uch activity is squarely within the statute" and thus prohibited

  5. Can-Am Plumbing, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    321 F.3d 145 (D.C. Cir. 2003)   Cited 12 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding determination by NLRB that dues unlawfully withheld on Davis–Bacon projects did not taint union's job targeting program was inadequate to support determination that operation of program was protected conduct, and remanding to NLRB to consider further evidence

  6. Local 32B-32J, Serv. Emp. Intern. v. N.L.R.B

    68 F.3d 490 (D.C. Cir. 1995)   Cited 13 times
    Holding that an agreement which, as applied, would “extend the contract to reach outside the contractual bargaining unit” violates § 8(e)

  7. Chauffeurs, Teamsters & Helpers Local 776 Affiliated with International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    973 F.2d 230 (3d Cir. 1992)   Cited 10 times
    Affirming the Board's imposition of attorney's fees from the time at which the arbitration became unlawful

  8. Wyman-Gordon Co. v. N.L.R.B

    654 F.2d 134 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 20 times
    Finding statement that "bargaining would 'begin at zero' and work up" constituted a violation of § 8

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Illinois Tool Works

    153 F.2d 811 (7th Cir. 1946)   Cited 47 times
    Noting that the test for violations of sec. 8, now codified as sec. 8, of the NLRA is whether "the employer engaged in conduct which, it may reasonably be said, tends to interfere with the free exercise of employee rights under the Act," and that actual or successful coercion need not be shown in order for the Board to find a violation