§

Madwestvaco Corporation

11-RC-006684 (N.L.R.B. Jan. 30, 2009)
Madwestvaco Corporation

17 Cited authorities

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    340 U.S. 474 (1951)   Cited 9,693 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Wyman-Gordon Co.

    394 U.S. 759 (1969)   Cited 812 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding invalid a legislative rule developed in agency adjudication

  3. Medo Photo Supply Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    321 U.S. 678 (1944)   Cited 270 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that offers of benefits to union supporters that induce them to leave the union violate § 8

  4. Overnite Transportation Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    140 F.3d 259 (D.C. Cir. 1998)   Cited 27 times
    Holding that agency is provable only by principal's conduct, and not by subjective beliefs of those dealing with alleged agent

  5. United States v. Pecora

    798 F.2d 614 (3d Cir. 1986)   Cited 41 times
    Noting legal fiction that "each conspirator is an agent of the other and . . . statements of one can therefore be attributable to all"

  6. United States v. Cody

    722 F.2d 1052 (2d Cir. 1983)   Cited 39 times
    Noting that one of the Government's theories of liability was "too indirect to support the claim that [the union official] had sufficient leverage to extort from [the employer] or that [the employer] had any incentive to bribe [the union official]"

  7. Van Dorn Plastic Machinery Co. v. N.L.R.B

    736 F.2d 343 (6th Cir. 1984)   Cited 29 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Van Dorn Plastic Machinery Co. v. NLRB, 736 F.2d 343 (6th Cir. 1984), we stated "[t]here may be cases where no forgery can be proved, but where the misrepresentation is so pervasive and the deception so artful that employees will be unable to separate truth from untruth and where their right to a free and fair choice will be affected."

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. BASF Wyandotte Corp.

    798 F.2d 849 (5th Cir. 1986)   Cited 25 times
    Finding that a collective bargaining agreement granting employees certain benefits under the plan while they were on "union leaves" of absence from the employer fell within the § 186(c) exception

  9. Kux Manufacturing Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    890 F.2d 804 (6th Cir. 1989)   Cited 20 times
    Finding conduct of members of in-plant organizing committee not attributable to union

  10. Randell Warehouse of Ariz., Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    252 F.3d 445 (D.C. Cir. 2001)   Cited 5 times

    No. 00-1155. Argued February 13, 2001. Decided June 12, 2001. On Petition for Review and Cross-Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Michelle L. Ray argued the cause for the petitioner. Gerard Morales was on brief. Harold P. Coxson, Jr. was on brief for amicus curiae Council on Labor Law Equality. Michael J. Murphy entered an appearance. Jill A. Griffin, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for the respondent. Leonard R. Page, General

  11. Section 1961 - Definitions

    18 U.S.C. § 1961   Cited 15,253 times   72 Legal Analyses
    Defining what the terms “person” and “enterprise” include

  12. Section 186 - Restrictions on financial transactions

    29 U.S.C. § 186   Cited 2,365 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Prohibiting payments to labor union officials