Lynn M. Pope, Complainant,v.John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionAug 28, 2003
01A33643 (E.E.O.C. Aug. 28, 2003)

01A33643

08-28-2003

Lynn M. Pope, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Lynn M. Pope v. United States Postal Service

01A33643

08-28-03

.

Lynn M. Pope,

Complainant,

v.

John E. Potter,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A33643

Agency Nos. 4B-028-0046-99; 4B-028-0086-99; 4B-028-0124-00

Hearing Nos. 160-A2-8230x; 160-A2-8539x

DECISION

Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405, the Commission accepts the complainant's

appeal from the agency's final order in the above-entitled matter.

Complainant alleged that the agency had discriminated against her on

the bases of sex (female), age (D.O.B. 08/02/57), and reprisal for prior

EEO activity when:

(1) on January 11, 1999, complainant was treated differently than

another carrier during her route inspection;

on January 16, 1999, complainant was required to work the holiday,

despite the fact that she worked her last holiday;

on January 19, 1999, the agency observed complainant's route;

on February 20, 1999, a) the agency asked complainant to work her

non-scheduled day; b) complainant asked for and was denied two hours

of help on her route; and c) a supervisor walked complainant's route

with her;

since complainant's route inspection, management refused to acknowledge

that complainant's route was overburdened;

management treated complainant differently than similarly situated male

employees by not providing her with route assistance;

on June 4, 1999, the agency suspended complainant for 14 days for

failure to satisfactorily perform the duties of her position;

On June 16, 1999, complainant was told to report to duty after serving

one day of her suspension;

on September 24, 1999, the agency issued complainant a 14 day suspension;

effective August 26, 2000, the agency removed complainant from her

position for failure to satisfactorily perform her duties by continuing

to expand her authorized street time.

After a review of the record in its entirety, including consideration

of all statements submitted on appeal, it is the decision of the Equal

Employment Opportunity Commission to affirm the final agency order because

the Administrative Judge's ultimate finding, that unlawful employment

discrimination was not proven by a preponderance of the evidence, is

supported by the record.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as

the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

___08-28-03_______________

Date