ยง

Louisville Container Corp.

99 N.L.R.B. 81 (N.L.R.B. 1952)
Louisville Container Corp.

5 Cited authorities

  1. Medo Photo Supply Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    321 U.S. 678 (1944)   Cited 270 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that offers of benefits to union supporters that induce them to leave the union violate ยง 8

  2. May Stores Co. v. Labor Board

    326 U.S. 376 (1945)   Cited 257 times
    Requiring "a clear determination by the Board of an attitude of opposition to the purposes of the Act to protect the rights of employees generally"

  3. Labor Board v. Falk Corp.

    308 U.S. 453 (1940)   Cited 140 times
    In Falk, the two proceedings were held simultaneously, whereas in our case the representation case preceded the unfair labor case.

  4. Joy Silk Mills v. National Labor Rel. Board

    185 F.2d 732 (D.C. Cir. 1950)   Cited 162 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Joy Silk the Court held that when an employer could have no doubt as to the majority status or when an employer refuses recognition of a union "due to a desire to gain time and to take action to dissipate the union's majority, the refusal is no longer justifiable and constitutes a violation of the duty to bargain set forth in section 8(a)(5) of the Act".

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Beatrice Foods Co.

    183 F.2d 726 (10th Cir. 1950)   Cited 11 times

    No. 4017. July 3, 1950. Melvin Pollack, Washington, D.C. (David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Marcel Mallet-Prevost, all of Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Floyd L. Rheam, Tulsa, Okla. (Valjean Biddison, Tulsa, Okla., on the brief), for respondent. Before BRATTON, HUXMAN and PICKETT, Circuit Judges. PICKETT, Circuit Judge. This case is before the court upon petition of the National Labor Relations Board for an enforcement of its order