§

Louise J. Spalding, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

0120072694 (E.E.O.C. Nov. 30, 2007)
Louise J. Spalding, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

2 Cited authorities

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.

    477 U.S. 242 (1986)   Cited 241,326 times   39 Legal Analyses
    Holding that summary judgment is not appropriate if "the dispute about a material fact is ‘genuine,’ that is, if the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party"

  2. Rule 56 - Summary Judgment

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 56   Cited 336,290 times   161 Legal Analyses
    Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit