§

Longshoremen'S Ilwu Local 7 (Georgia-Pacific)

273 N.L.R.B. 363 (N.L.R.B. 1984)
Longshoremen'S Ilwu Local 7 (Georgia-Pacific)

6 Cited authorities

  1. Bill Johnson's Restaurants, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    461 U.S. 731 (1983)   Cited 978 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the NLRB could not bar an employer from pursuing a well-grounded lawsuit for damages under state law

  2. Carey v. Westinghouse Corp.

    375 U.S. 261 (1964)   Cited 365 times
    Holding that Section 301 gives a federal court jurisdiction over a suit to enforce an arbitration clause in a collective bargaining agreement even if the case is "truly a representation case" that could also be heard by the NLRB under Section 9 of the NLRA

  3. International Union v. Rockwell Intern. Corp.

    619 F.2d 580 (6th Cir. 1980)   Cited 24 times
    Holding that "the Board's § 10(k) determination has priority over a conflicting arbitrator's award"

  4. New Orleans Typographical v. N.L.R.B

    368 F.2d 755 (5th Cir. 1966)   Cited 39 times
    In New Orleans arbitration was permitted to proceed so there would be an expeditious resolution of the dispute in the event the Section 10(k) hearing could not resolve it. Here the Board approved a "voluntary adjustment" because it believed it settled the entire dispute and made a Section 10(k) hearing unnecessary.

  5. N.L.R.B. v. International Ass'n of Bridge

    549 F.2d 634 (9th Cir. 1977)   Cited 5 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. International Ass'n of Bridge, Etc., 549 F.2d at 641, we enforced an order of the N.L.R.B. based on the N.L. R.B. finding that an employer was not bound by a jurisdictional decision of the AFL-CIO dispute board because the employer had not expressly consented to be bound and had not participated in the submission of the dispute to that body.

  6. Dock Load. Unload., v. Richeson Sons

    280 F. Supp. 402 (E.D. La. 1968)   Cited 11 times
    In Dock Loaders, the court held that the dicta in Carey command respect, and in view of such language it ruled that the Labor Board's decision awarding the disputed work to Teamsters barred the recovery of damages in the § 301 case under the arbitrator's award.