4 Cited authorities
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Bus. Mach
228 F.2d 553 (2d Cir. 1955) Cited 67 timesIn National Labor Relations Bd. v. Business Mach. etc., CIO (228 F.2d 553) the Circuit Court of Appeals for this circuit declared (p. 559) that "The only thing proscribed by § 8(b)(4) is inducement or encouragement of the employees of the customers".
Douds v. Metropolitan Federation of Architects, Ect.
75 F. Supp. 672 (S.D.N.Y. 1948) Cited 51 times 1 Legal AnalysesIn Douds v. Metropolitan Federation of Architects, etc., 75 F. Supp. 672 (S.D.N.Y. 1948), the court laid heavy emphasis on the economic effect of the work performed by the ally's employees.
Local No. 636, Etc. v. N.L.R.B
278 F.2d 858 (D.C. Cir. 1960) Cited 16 timesNo. 15012. Argued February 8, 1960. Decided March 31, 1960. Mr. Martin F. O'Donoghue, Washington, D.C., with whom Messrs. Thomas X. Dunn and Patrick C. O'Donoghue, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for petitioners. Mr. Norton J. Come, Deputy Asst. Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, with whom Messrs. Thomas J. McDermott, Associate Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, and Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, were on the brief, for respondent
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. International Union of United Brewery, Flour, Cereal, Soft Drink & Distillery Workers of America
272 F.2d 817 (10th Cir. 1959) Cited 10 timesNo. 6081. November 19, 1959. Duane B. Beeson, Washington, D.C. (Jerome D. Fenton, Thomas J. McDermott, Marcel Mallet-Prevost and James C. Paras, Washington, D.C., were with him on the brief), for petitioner. James C. Paradise, Cincinnati, Ohio (Philip Hornbein, Jr., Denver, Colo., was with him on the brief), for respondents. Before MURRAH, Chief Judge, and HUXMAN and PICKETT, Circuit Judges. MURRAH, Chief Judge. In this action under Section 10(e) of the National Labor Relations Act as amended 29