ยง

Local 220, Int'l Union of Electrical, Radio, Etc.

127 N.L.R.B. 1514 (N.L.R.B. 1960)
Local 220, Int'l Union of Electrical, Radio, Etc.

5 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Insurance Agents

    361 U.S. 477 (1960)   Cited 324 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, subject to the duty to bargain in good faith, "parties should have wide latitude in their negotiations"

  2. Labor Board v. Drivers Local Union

    362 U.S. 274 (1960)   Cited 109 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In NLRB v. Drivers Local 639, 362 U.S. 274 (1960), the Court held that ยง 8(b)(1)(A) was "a grant of power to the Board limited to authority to proceed against union tactics involving violence, intimidation, and reprisal or threats thereof."

  3. Labor Board v. Crompton Mills

    337 U.S. 217 (1949)   Cited 102 times
    Holding unlawful unilateral changes significantly different from "any which the employer has proposed" during bargaining

  4. Insurance Agents' Int'l Un. v. N.L.R.B

    260 F.2d 736 (D.C. Cir. 1958)   Cited 13 times

    No. 14262. Argued September 12, 1958. Decided October 23, 1958. Certiorari Granted January 26, 1959. See 79 S.Ct. 352. Mr. Isaac N. Groner, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Mr. Frederick U. Reel, Atty., N.L.R.B., with whom Messrs. Jerome D. Fenton, Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Thomas J. McDermott, Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., and Melvin Pollack, Atty., N.L.R.B., were on the brief, for respondent. Mr. Nahum A. Bernstein, New York City, for Prudential

  5. Textile Workers Union v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    227 F.2d 409 (D.C. Cir. 1955)   Cited 3 times

    No. 12248. Argued May 4, 1955. Decided October 27, 1955. Mr. David E. Feller, Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. Arthur J. Goldberg, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for petitioners. Mr. Owsley Vose, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, of the bar of the Supreme Court of Illinois, pro hac vice, by special leave of Court, with whom Mr. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, was on the brief, for respondent. Mr. Robert G. Johnson, Washington, D.C., Atty., also