§
Local 511

10 Cited authorities

  1. Edison Co. v. Labor Board

    305 U.S. 197 (1938)   Cited 19,335 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a Board order cannot be grounded in hearsay

  2. Labor Board v. Denver Bldg. Council

    341 U.S. 675 (1951)   Cited 494 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Affirming Board's assertion of jurisdiction over activities taking place at local construction site based on finding that "any widespread application of the practices charged might well result in substantially decreasing" the flow of interstate commerce

  3. Electrical Workers v. Labor Board

    341 U.S. 694 (1951)   Cited 246 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the prohibition of picketing in furtherance of unlawful objectives is not an abridgement of free speech

  4. Labor Bd. v. Greyhound Lines

    303 U.S. 261 (1938)   Cited 264 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Pennsylvania Greyhound Lines, Inc., 303 U.S. 261, 58 S.Ct. 571, 572, 82 L.Ed. 831, 115 A.L.R. 307, three related corporations were involved. The two respondents claimed that the third corporation was the `employer'.

  5. Carpenters Union v. Labor Board

    341 U.S. 707 (1951)   Cited 89 times
    In Carpenters Union v. Labor Board, 341 U.S. 707, 71 S.Ct. 966, 971, supra, the Supreme Court said: "The use of such pressure on this renovation project was merely a sample of what might be repeated elsewhere if not prohibited. The underlying dispute between petitioners and Watson's has not been shown to have been resolved."

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Wine, Liquor, U

    178 F.2d 584 (2d Cir. 1949)   Cited 24 times

    No. 29, Docket 2137-1. Argued November 7, 1949. Decided December 12, 1949. Robert N. Denham, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Assistant General Counsel, Reeves R. Hilton, Dominick L. Manoli and Albert Dreyer, Washington, D.C., for National Labor Relations Board, Reeves R. Hilton, Washington, D.C., counsel. Cohen Burlakoff, New York City, Arnold Cohen, New York City, for respondent, Joseph E. Brill and Harold Krieger, New York City, on the brief. Before

  7. National Labor Relations Bd. v. United BHD

    184 F.2d 60 (10th Cir. 1950)   Cited 22 times

    No. 3969. August 14, 1950. Dominick L. Manoli, Washington, D.C. (Robert N. Denham, David P. Findling, and A. Norman Somers, all of Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Clif. Langsdale, Kansas City, Mo. (John J. Manning, Kansas City, Mo., on the brief), for respondents. Before PHILLIPS, Chief Judge, and BRATTON and HUXMAN, Circuit Judges. BRATTON, Circuit Judge. In presently pertinent part, section 8(b)(4)(A) of the National Labor Relations Act, 49 Stat. 449, as amended by the Labor-Management

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Washington-Oregon

    211 F.2d 149 (9th Cir. 1954)   Cited 17 times

    No. 13768. March 8, 1954. George J. Bott, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. General Counsel, Bernard Dunau, James A. Ryan, Attorneys, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Wettrick, Flood O'Brien, George E. Flood, George O. Toulouse, Jr., Seattle, Wash., Francis X. Ward, Indianapolis, Ind., for respondent. Before DENMAN, Chief Judge, and HEALY and POPE, Circuit Judges. DENMAN, Chief Judge. The National Labor Relations Board, hereafter the

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Denver Bldg

    193 F.2d 421 (10th Cir. 1952)   Cited 13 times

    No. 4171. January 4, 1952. Bernard Dunau, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, David P. Findling, A. Norman Somers, Fannie M. Boyls, and Julius G. Serot, all of Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Philip Hornbein, Jr., Denver, Colo. (Philip Hornbein, Denver, Colo., on the brief), for respondents. Before BRATTON, HUXMAN and PICKETT, Circuit Judges. HUXMAN, Circuit Judge. This is a conventional proceeding in which the Board seeks enforcement of its order against Denver Building and Construction

  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters

    228 F.2d 83 (2d Cir. 1955)   Cited 4 times

    No. 124, Docket 23703. Argued November 10, 1955. Decided December 2, 1955. Samuel M. Singer, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Theophil C. Kammholz, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Nancy M. Sherman, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. John J. Walsh, Utica, N.Y., for respondent. Before CLARK, Chief Judge, and LUMBARD and WATERMAN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. This is a petition for enforcement of