§
Lion Uniform

10 Cited authorities

  1. Hensley v. Eckerhart

    461 U.S. 424 (1983)   Cited 22,338 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding a civil-rights plaintiff can recover attorney's fees for claims that "involve a common core of facts or will be based on related legal theories," even if only one of those claims arises under a fee-shifting statute

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 358 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  3. Wallace Corp. v. Labor Board

    323 U.S. 248 (1944)   Cited 162 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that corporation committed unfair labor practice

  4. Dougherty v. Lehman

    711 F.2d 555 (3d Cir. 1983)   Cited 101 times
    Finding agency position to be substantially justified where the issue raised a close question of law and at least one other court agreed with the government's position

  5. Tyler Business Services, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    695 F.2d 73 (4th Cir. 1982)   Cited 79 times
    Blocking recovery of attorneys fees in agency actions which were resolved prior to Act's effective date, although relying on a different interpretation of the Act

  6. Goldhaber v. Foley

    698 F.2d 193 (3d Cir. 1983)   Cited 57 times
    In Goldhaber v. Foley, 698 F.2d 193 (3d Cir. 1983), we held that EAJA entitles a plaintiff to "charge the United States with that portion of the expenses attributable to its unjustifiable positions," id. at 197 (footnote omitted), and not with "the entire expense of litigation," where the United States has prevailed in at least one aspect of the action, id. The district court must determine which portion of the prevailing party's fee application is related to litigation over the government's unjustified position.

  7. Temp Tech Industries, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    756 F.2d 586 (7th Cir. 1985)   Cited 17 times
    Concluding that the decision to litigate an issue that turned on a credibility assessment is not itself unreasonable

  8. Textile Workers of Am., Afl-Cio v. N.L.R.B

    294 F.2d 738 (D.C. Cir. 1961)   Cited 18 times

    No. 16057. Argued May 26, 1961. Decided July 27, 1961. Mr. Edward Wynne, New York City, of the bar of the Court of Appeals of New York, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, with whom Mr. Benjamin Wyle, New York City, was on the brief, for petitioner. Mr. Jerry D. Anker, Washington, D.C., also entered an appearance for petitioner. Mr. Allison W. Brown, Jr., Atty., N.L.R.B., with whom Messrs. Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., and Marcel

  9. Section 2412 - Costs and fees

    28 U.S.C. § 2412   Cited 30,689 times   22 Legal Analyses
    Limiting the eligibility of individuals and entities to claim attorney's fees under EAJA to those who "net worth" is under specified amounts

  10. Section 504 - Costs and fees of parties

    5 U.S.C. § 504   Cited 663 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Authorizing payment of attorney's fees by the Government when a party prevails in a federal agency adjudication