§

Leonetti Furniture Manufacturing Co.

134 N.L.R.B. 233 (N.L.R.B. 1961)
Leonetti Furniture Manufacturing Co.

20 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Seven-Up Co.

    344 U.S. 344 (1953)   Cited 368 times
    Upholding the Board's application of a back pay remedy different from that previously imposed in similar cases, despite no announcement of new remedial rule in rulemaking proceeding

  2. Republic Steel Corp. v. Labor Board

    311 U.S. 7 (1940)   Cited 231 times   3 Legal Analyses
    In Republic Steel, supra, the Court refused to enforce an order requiring the employer to pay the full amount of back pay to an employee who had been paid to work for the Work Projects Administration in the meantime.

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Whitin Mach. Works

    204 F.2d 883 (1st Cir. 1953)   Cited 57 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Whitin Machine Works, 204 F.2d 883 (1st Cir.1953), for example, an assistant supervisor in his employer's accounting department was, upon a consideration of the nature of his work, determined not to be a supervisor for purposes of litigating his discharge from employment, and, therefore, he was entitled to the protections of the National Labor Relations Act. 204 F.2d at 886.

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Brown-Dunkin Company

    287 F.2d 17 (10th Cir. 1961)   Cited 28 times

    No. 6402. January 19, 1961. Rosanna A. Blake, Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Dominick L. Manoli, Marcel Mallet-Prevost and Morton Namrow, Washington, D.C., on brief), for petitioner. Karl H. Mueller, Fort Worth, Tex. (Harold E. Mueller, Fort Worth, Tex., on brief), for respondent. Before MURRAH, Chief Judge, and BRATTON and BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judges. MURRAH, Chief Judge. This petition is to enforce an order of the National Labor Relations Board finding the respondent, a large department store

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Illinois Tool Works

    153 F.2d 811 (7th Cir. 1946)   Cited 47 times
    Noting that the test for violations of sec. 8, now codified as sec. 8, of the NLRA is whether "the employer engaged in conduct which, it may reasonably be said, tends to interfere with the free exercise of employee rights under the Act," and that actual or successful coercion need not be shown in order for the Board to find a violation

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Firedoor Corporation of America

    291 F.2d 328 (2d Cir. 1961)   Cited 17 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Firedoor Corp. of America, 2 Cir., 291 F.2d 328, 331, the rule under discussion is stated, "Interrogation of employees is legal, when the questioning is not accompanied by any explicit threats, cf. N.L.R.B. v. Beaner [Beaver] Meadow Creamery, 3 Cir., 1954, 215 F.2d 247, if under all the circumstances coercion is not implicit in the questioning.

  7. Hartsell Mills Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    111 F.2d 291 (4th Cir. 1940)   Cited 41 times

    No. 4592. April 10, 1940. On Petition for Review of Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the Hartsell Mills Company to review an order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition denied; order modified and enforced. Edwin A. Lucas, of Philadelphia, Pa. (Benjamin W. Parham and Parham Taylor, all of Oxford, N.C., and Drinker, Biddle Reath, of Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for petitioner. Bertram Edises, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, of Washington, D.C., (Charles

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Lewis

    246 F.2d 886 (9th Cir. 1957)   Cited 16 times
    In Lewis, a partnership that manufactured and sold shoes gradually transferred the manufacturing portion of its business to a corporation at a different location.

  9. National Labor Bd. v. L. Ronney Sons Fur

    206 F.2d 730 (9th Cir. 1953)   Cited 18 times

    No. 13315. August 24, 1953. George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Owsley Vose, Louis Schwartz, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., Howard F. LeBaron, Director, National Labor Relations Board, Los Angeles, Cal., and Edward Friedman, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Richard A. Perkins and Arthur Garrett, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent. Before MATHEWS, BONE and ORR

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Lively Service Company

    290 F.2d 205 (10th Cir. 1961)   Cited 7 times

    No. 6473. April 21, 1961. Margaret M. Farmer, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Leonard L. Pickering, Albuquerque, N.M., for respondent. Before MURRAH, Chief Judge, PICKETT, Circuit Judge, and KERR, District Judge. KERR, District Judge. Pursuant to Section 10(e) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 160(e), the National Labor Relations Board petitions this Court for a decree enforcing the order of the Board requiring respondent to cease and desist from certain unfair